From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Roland Dreier <roland@topspin.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: <oliver@neukum.name>, <wjhun@ayrnetworks.com>, <paulus@samba.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PCI DMA to small buffers on cache-incoherent arch
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 19:29:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020611172920.18340@smtp.adsl.oleane.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52y9dl65aa.fsf@topspin.com>
>This may use less memory than 1) or 2) above on some architectures but
>will use more than 1) on cache-coherent architectures. It makes the
>code even more complex since now the code that allocates the dma
>buffer has to know which PCI device will use it (for example, in USB,
>the hub driver is separated from the HCD driver, which is who knows
>about the PCI bus).
What about an arch that can be both coherent or incoherent (the same
kernel binary would boot both) ?
I can also imagine quite a bunch of embedded stuffs where you may have
both coherent and non-coherent devices depending on the bus the live
on or on bridge bugs.
For your example, I don't buy it. You could well design the USB urb
allocation in such a way that they are passed down the controller of
a given device.
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-12 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-08 20:38 PCI DMA to small buffers on cache-incoherent arch Roland Dreier
2002-06-08 13:58 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-06-09 0:52 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-08 23:03 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-09 0:40 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-09 0:53 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-09 1:26 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-09 5:29 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-09 6:16 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-10 16:03 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-11 14:04 ` David Woodhouse
2002-06-09 6:45 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-10 4:24 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-10 10:00 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-10 10:24 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-09 9:51 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-06-09 10:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-06-10 4:27 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-10 15:59 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-10 17:03 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-10 17:22 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-10 17:29 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-10 17:39 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-10 19:03 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-10 19:14 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-10 19:21 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-10 19:26 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-10 17:57 ` Russell King
2002-06-10 17:28 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-10 18:07 ` William Jhun
2002-06-10 18:29 ` William Jhun
2002-06-10 18:33 ` Mark Zealey
2002-06-10 18:44 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-11 3:10 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 4:04 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-11 4:16 ` Brad Hards
2002-06-11 4:24 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-11 4:24 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 4:21 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 4:39 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-11 4:38 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 6:23 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-11 6:38 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 7:38 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-11 7:36 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 7:43 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 8:07 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-11 8:15 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 12:06 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-11 12:04 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 14:23 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-14 4:14 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 18:26 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-11 17:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2002-06-12 12:02 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-11 20:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-06-12 12:02 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 23:00 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-11 23:56 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-12 0:09 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-11 15:57 ` William Jhun
2002-06-12 9:06 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-12 20:16 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 11:47 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 12:08 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-14 4:41 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 16:09 ` William Jhun
2002-06-09 1:30 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-06-09 5:29 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-09 6:33 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-06-09 6:50 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-09 6:57 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-06-09 7:15 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-09 8:48 ` Russell King
2002-06-09 15:42 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-06-09 23:26 ` Oliver Neukum
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-11 5:31 David Brownell
2002-06-11 5:44 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 15:12 ` David Brownell
2002-06-11 15:44 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-12 3:25 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 17:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-06-12 9:42 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 14:14 ` David Brownell
2002-06-12 15:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-06-12 18:44 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-12 19:13 ` David Brownell
2002-06-12 19:58 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-12 22:51 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 23:17 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-13 4:57 ` David Brownell
2002-06-12 22:46 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-13 5:13 ` David Brownell
2002-06-13 9:38 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 22:50 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 6:25 ` David Brownell
2002-06-12 6:24 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 7:06 ` David Brownell
2002-06-12 9:22 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020611172920.18340@smtp.adsl.oleane.com \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.name \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=roland@topspin.com \
--cc=wjhun@ayrnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox