public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: mingo@elte.hu
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, kravetz@us.ibm.com, rml@tech9.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] switch_mm()'s desire to run without the rq lock
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 15:31:37 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020612.153137.28764566.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206121551190.10732-100000@elte.hu>


Yikes!!! I just noticed a problem.

You can't just delete prepare_to_switch(), that is where we do
the register window flush on Sparc and it has the be at that
exact location.

Can you redo your diffs, preserving prepare_to_switch()?

      parent reply	other threads:[~2002-06-12 22:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-06-06 23:20 Scheduler Bug (set_cpus_allowed) Mike Kravetz
2002-06-07 18:36 ` Robert Love
2002-06-07 19:12   ` Mike Kravetz
2002-06-10 20:12     ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-10 20:57       ` Mike Kravetz
2002-06-10 22:35         ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-10 23:15           ` Mike Kravetz
2002-06-10 23:24             ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-10 23:28               ` Robert Love
2002-06-11  0:05                 ` [patch] current scheduler bits, 2.5.21 Ingo Molnar
2002-06-11  0:27                   ` Robert Love
2002-06-11 17:35                     ` [patch] current scheduler bits #2, 2.5.21 Ingo Molnar
2002-06-11 18:25                       ` Robert Love
2002-06-11 18:33                         ` [patch] current scheduler bits #3, 2.5.21 Ingo Molnar
2002-06-13 21:26                           ` [PATCH] " Robert Love
2002-06-13 22:06                             ` [patch] current scheduler bits #4, 2.5.21 Ingo Molnar
2002-06-07 23:20   ` Scheduler Bug (set_cpus_allowed) J.A. Magallon
2002-06-12  0:00     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-06-10 18:50   ` Mike Kravetz
2002-06-10 20:02     ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-12 11:54       ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 16:57         ` [patch] switch_mm()'s desire to run without the rq lock Ingo Molnar
2002-06-12 21:54           ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 22:31           ` David S. Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020612.153137.28764566.davem@redhat.com \
    --to=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=kravetz@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox