public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Anjali Kulkarni" <anjali@indranetworks.com>
To: mingo@elte.hu, Anjali Kulkarni <anjali@indranetworks.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: scheduler problems
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 00:14:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200206120714.AAA07894@eagle.he.net> (raw)


> (given that the current 2.2 kernel is 2.2.21, the first thing would 
be to
> test it there too.)
> 

Thanks, I 'll do that.

> > [...] It is due to the fact that the schedule() function does not 
find
> > the 'current' process in the runqueue. [...]
> 
> a crash in line 384 means that the runqueue got corrupted by 
something,
> most likely caused by buggy kernel code outside of the scheduler.

Right, I thought of that, but how is it that it gets corrupt at exactly 
the same offset in task_struct of that process and every time with 
different processes? (I have run it atleast 20-30 times). And it just 
doesnt come if I kill the process in question? (I couldnt kill kupdate, 
and hence it comes anyways). And I have checked the task_struct of that 
process, the next_task & prev_task & other fields are not corrupted. 
Ofcource, it's still possible, like if the memory allocated & freed by 
my code is then used by scheduler for allocating task_struct; and then 
it is accessed again by mistake by my code at the same offset. 
But you feel sure it's a run queue corruption problem, and not anything 
else? If so, is there any particular way to debug this?

> > Can anyone tell me what's happening here? My kernel module is no 
way the
> > cause of any of this. [...]
> 
> does it happen if you do not run your kernel module after bootup, 
ever?

No, it does not:(

Thanks,
Anjali

> 
> 	Ingo
> 
> 


Anjali Kulkarni
Software Engineer
Indra Networks

~Living Well is the best Revenge~

             reply	other threads:[~2002-06-12  7:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-06-12  7:14 Anjali Kulkarni [this message]
2002-06-12 10:20 ` scheduler problems Richard Zidlicky
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-13  5:38 Anjali Kulkarni
2002-06-12  5:20 Anjali Kulkarni
2002-06-12  6:20 ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200206120714.AAA07894@eagle.he.net \
    --to=anjali@indranetworks.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox