From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: akpm@zip.com.au, torvalds@transmeta.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, k-suganuma@mvj.biglobe.ne.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 Nonlinear CPU support
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 15:01:19 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020613150119.16115952.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020612.022641.123609388.davem@redhat.com>
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002 02:26:41 -0700 (PDT)
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> wrote:
> From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 16:58:23 +1000
>
> In message <20020611.021043.04190747.davem@redhat.com> you write:
> > And remember, it's the anal "every microoptimization at all costs"
> > people that keep the kernel sane and from running out of control bloat
> > wise.
>
> But it also gave us crap like net/ipv4/route.c:ip_rt_acct_read() 8(
>
> That's far from being an attempt optimization :-)
I was giving you the benifit of the doubt, that both the design (binary
data from /proc) and the code (#ifdef, cpu_logical_map(0), and "256"
sprinkled everywhere) were some insane attempt at speed, rather that
a demonstration of sheer programming idiocy.
I stand corrected 8). This papers over the damage:
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.21/net/ipv4/route.c working-2.5.21-ipacct/net/ipv4/route.c
--- linux-2.5.21/net/ipv4/route.c Mon May 13 12:00:40 2002
+++ working-2.5.21-ipacct/net/ipv4/route.c Thu Jun 13 14:33:41 2002
@@ -2418,10 +2418,15 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ROUTE
struct ip_rt_acct *ip_rt_acct;
+/* This code sucks. But you should have seen it before! --RR */
+
+/* IP route accounting ptr for this logical cpu number. */
+#define IP_RT_ACCT_CPU(i) (ip_rt_acct + cpu_logical_map(i) * 256)
+
static int ip_rt_acct_read(char *buffer, char **start, off_t offset,
int length, int *eof, void *data)
{
- *start = buffer;
+ unsigned int i;
if ((offset & 3) || (length & 3))
return -EIO;
@@ -2430,35 +2435,18 @@
length = sizeof(struct ip_rt_acct) * 256 - offset;
*eof = 1;
}
- if (length > 0) {
- u32 *dst = (u32*)buffer;
- u32 *src = (u32*)(((u8*)ip_rt_acct) + offset);
-
- memcpy(dst, src, length);
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- if (smp_num_cpus > 1 || cpu_logical_map(0) != 0) {
- int i;
- int cnt = length / 4;
-
- for (i = 0; i < smp_num_cpus; i++) {
- int cpu = cpu_logical_map(i);
- int k;
- if (cpu == 0)
- continue;
-
- src = (u32*)(((u8*)ip_rt_acct) + offset +
- cpu * 256 * sizeof(struct ip_rt_acct));
+ /* Copy first cpu. */
+ *start = buffer;
+ memcpy(buffer, IP_RT_ACCT_CPU(0), length);
- for (k = 0; k < cnt; k++)
- dst[k] += src[k];
- }
- }
-#endif
- return length;
+ /* Add the other cpus in, one int at a time */
+ for (i = 1; i < smp_num_cpus; i++) {
+ unsigned int j;
+ for (j = 0; j < length/4; j++)
+ ((u32*)buffer)[j] += ((u32*)IP_RT_ACCT_CPU(i))[j];
}
- return 0;
+ return length;
}
#endif
--
there are those who do and those who hang on and you don't see too
many doers quoting their contemporaries. -- Larry McVoy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-13 5:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-11 7:08 [PATCH] 2.5.21 Nonlinear CPU support Rusty Russell
2002-06-11 7:42 ` Andrew Morton
2002-06-11 9:09 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-11 9:10 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 6:58 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-12 9:26 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-13 5:01 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2002-06-13 5:55 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 9:27 ` Andrew Morton
2002-06-11 11:22 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-06-12 5:57 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-12 7:54 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-06-12 8:06 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-12 8:25 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-06-12 19:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-12 13:10 ` Mikael Pettersson
2002-06-13 2:42 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-12 0:53 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-12 8:36 ` Helge Hafting
2002-06-11 10:57 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-06-11 17:59 ` Robert Love
2002-06-12 4:11 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-11 19:29 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-06-11 14:54 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-06-12 19:32 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-06-12 15:08 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-06-12 17:36 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-06-12 18:34 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-06-12 19:39 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-06-12 20:41 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-06-12 21:03 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-06-12 21:15 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-06-12 20:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-06-12 20:54 ` Robert Love
2002-06-12 20:57 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-06-12 22:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-06-13 1:33 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-06-13 1:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-06-13 1:45 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-06-13 2:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-06-13 2:21 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-06-13 8:43 ` Helge Hafting
2002-06-11 18:01 ` Robert Love
2002-06-12 7:57 ` Alan Cox
2002-06-12 8:01 ` Rusty Russell
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0206121226550.1533-100000@penguin.transmeta. com>
2002-06-12 21:29 ` Anton Altaparmakov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020613150119.16115952.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=k-suganuma@mvj.biglobe.ne.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox