From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Richard Brunner <richard.brunner@amd.com>,
mark.langsdorf@amd.com
Subject: Re: another new version of pageattr caching conflict fix for 2.4
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 01:37:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020617013732.A14867@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1y9dft2t8.fsf@frodo.biederman.org>
> > MTRRs work on physical, not virtual memory, so they have no aliasing
> > issues.
>
> Doesn't the AGP aperture cause a physical alias? Leading to strange
Yes. That's what this patch is all about.
> the same problems if the agp aperture was marked write-back, and the
AGP aperture is uncacheable, not write-back.
> memory was marked uncacheable. My gut impression is to just make the
> agp aperture write-back cacheable, and then we don't have to change
> the kernel page table at all. Unfortunately I don't expect the host
That would violate the AGP specification.
> bridge with the memory and agp controllers to like that mode,
> especially as there are physical aliasing issues.
exactly.
>
> > Fixing the MTRRs is fine, but it is really outside the scope of my patch.
> > Just changing the kernel map wouldn't be enough to fix wrong MTRRs,
> > because it wouldn't cover highmem.
>
> My preferred fix is to use PAT, to override the buggy mtrrs. Which
> brings up the same aliasing issues. Which makes it related but
> outside the scope of the problem.
I don't follow you here. IMHO it is much easier to fix the MTRRs in the
MTRR driver for those rare buggy BIOS (if they exist - I've never seen one)
than to hack up all of memory management just to get the right bits set.
I see no disadvantage of using the MTRRs and it is lot simpler than
PAT and pte bits.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-16 23:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-13 20:15 New version of pageattr caching conflict fix for 2.4 Andi Kleen
2002-06-14 1:03 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-14 1:24 ` Andi Kleen
2002-06-14 1:37 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-14 4:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-06-14 4:17 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-14 4:27 ` Andi Kleen
2002-06-14 15:28 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-14 16:13 ` Andi Kleen
2002-06-14 17:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-06-14 18:05 ` another new " Andi Kleen
2002-06-16 10:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-16 16:48 ` Andi Kleen
2002-06-16 17:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-16 18:43 ` Andi Kleen
2002-06-16 19:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-16 23:37 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2002-06-17 0:08 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-06-17 4:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-17 6:53 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-06-17 15:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-14 4:28 ` New " Andrea Arcangeli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-17 21:07 another new " richard.brunner
2002-06-18 17:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-17 21:13 richard.brunner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020617013732.A14867@wotan.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.langsdorf@amd.com \
--cc=richard.brunner@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox