From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@linux.realnet.co.sz>,
Robert Love <rml@mvista.com>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com,
colpatch@us.ibm.com, hbaum@us.ibm.com, cleverdj@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch] 2.4.19-pre10-ac2: O(1) scheduler merge, -A3.
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 00:16:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020618071626.GO22961@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206171050050.9574-100000@e2>
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 11:00:26AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> irqbalance uses the set_ioapic_affinity() method to set affinity. The
> clustered APIC code is broken if it doesnt handle this properly. (i dont
> have such hardware so i cant tell, but it indeed doesnt appear to handle
> this case properly.) By wrapping around at node boundary the irqbalance
> code will work just fine.
Perhaps a brief look at the code will help. Please forgive my
non-preservation of whitespace as I cut and pasted it.
static inline void balance_irq(int irq)
{
#if CONFIG_SMP
irq_balance_t *entry = irq_balance + irq;
unsigned long now = jiffies;
if (unlikely(entry->timestamp != now)) {
unsigned long allowed_mask;
int random_number;
rdtscl(random_number);
random_number &= 1;
allowed_mask = cpu_online_map & irq_affinity[irq];
entry->timestamp = now;
entry->cpu = move(entry->cpu, allowed_mask, now, random_number);
set_ioapic_affinity(irq, 1 << entry->cpu);
}
#endif
}
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1 << entry->cpu
This could be problematic ...
static void set_ioapic_affinity (unsigned int irq, unsigned long mask)
{
unsigned long flags;
/*
* Only the first 8 bits are valid.
*/
mask = mask << 24;
spin_lock_irqsave(&ioapic_lock, flags);
__DO_ACTION(1, = mask, )
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ioapic_lock, flags);
}
According to this, nothing over 8 cpu's can work as the cpu id is used
as a shift into an 8-bit bitfield. Also,
#define __DO_ACTION(R, ACTION, FINAL) \
\
{ \
int pin; \
struct irq_pin_list *entry = irq_2_pin + irq; \
\
for (;;) { \
unsigned int reg; \
pin = entry->pin; \
if (pin == -1) \
break; \
reg = io_apic_read(entry->apic, 0x10 + R + pin*2); \
reg ACTION; \
io_apic_modify(entry->apic, reg); \
if (!entry->next) \
break; \
entry = irq_2_pin + entry->next; \
} \
FINAL; \
}
ACTION is supposed to be an assignment to reg; in clustered hierarchical
destination format this is not a bitmask as assumed by 1 << entry->cpu.
Matt, Mike, please comment.
Cheers,
Bill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-18 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-13 19:21 [PATCH] 2.4-ac: sparc64 support for O(1) scheduler Robert Love
2002-06-14 4:25 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-14 17:32 ` Robert Love
2002-06-15 13:22 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-20 19:42 ` Alan Cox
2002-06-16 15:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-16 17:00 ` [patch] 2.4.19-pre10-ac2: O(1) scheduler merge, -A3 Ingo Molnar
2002-06-16 23:57 ` Robert Love
2002-06-17 0:13 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-06-17 4:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-17 0:15 ` Robert Love
2002-06-17 3:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-17 3:57 ` Robert Love
2002-06-17 4:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-17 4:02 ` Robert Love
2002-06-17 4:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-17 4:49 ` [patch] 2.5.22 current scheduler bits #1 Ingo Molnar
2002-06-17 3:24 ` [patch] 2.4.19-pre10-ac2: O(1) scheduler merge, -A3 Ingo Molnar
2002-06-17 3:35 ` Robert Love
2002-06-17 4:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-17 7:50 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-06-17 8:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-17 8:23 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-06-17 9:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-17 9:34 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-06-18 7:16 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2002-06-19 1:05 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-06-20 20:22 ` Andrew Theurer
2002-06-24 0:16 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-06-17 16:26 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-17 4:51 ` Toshiba PCToPIC97 PC Card freeze in 2.4.18 Stephen Satchell
2002-06-16 23:45 ` [PATCH] 2.4-ac: sparc64 support for O(1) scheduler Robert Love
2002-06-17 5:28 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-17 21:18 ` Robert Love
2002-06-14 22:00 ` Thomas Duffy
2002-06-15 13:35 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020618071626.GO22961@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=cleverdj@us.ibm.com \
--cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=hbaum@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rml@mvista.com \
--cc=zwane@linux.realnet.co.sz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox