public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@linux.realnet.co.sz>,
	Robert Love <rml@mvista.com>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com,
	colpatch@us.ibm.com, hbaum@us.ibm.com, cleverdj@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch] 2.4.19-pre10-ac2: O(1) scheduler merge, -A3.
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 00:16:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020618071626.GO22961@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206171050050.9574-100000@e2>

On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 11:00:26AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> irqbalance uses the set_ioapic_affinity() method to set affinity. The
> clustered APIC code is broken if it doesnt handle this properly. (i dont
> have such hardware so i cant tell, but it indeed doesnt appear to handle
> this case properly.) By wrapping around at node boundary the irqbalance
> code will work just fine.

Perhaps a brief look at the code will help. Please forgive my
non-preservation of whitespace as I cut and pasted it.


static inline void balance_irq(int irq)
{
#if CONFIG_SMP
    irq_balance_t *entry = irq_balance + irq;
    unsigned long now = jiffies;

    if (unlikely(entry->timestamp != now)) {
        unsigned long allowed_mask;
        int random_number;

        rdtscl(random_number);
        random_number &= 1;

        allowed_mask = cpu_online_map & irq_affinity[irq];
        entry->timestamp = now;
        entry->cpu = move(entry->cpu, allowed_mask, now, random_number);
        set_ioapic_affinity(irq, 1 << entry->cpu);
    }
#endif
}

        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
	1 << entry->cpu



This could be problematic ...


static void set_ioapic_affinity (unsigned int irq, unsigned long mask)
{
    unsigned long flags;

    /*
     * Only the first 8 bits are valid.
     */
    mask = mask << 24;
    spin_lock_irqsave(&ioapic_lock, flags);
    __DO_ACTION(1, = mask, )
    spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ioapic_lock, flags);
}


According to this, nothing over 8 cpu's can work as the cpu id is used
as a shift into an 8-bit bitfield. Also,


#define __DO_ACTION(R, ACTION, FINAL)                                   \
                                                                        \
{                                                                       \
        int pin;                                                        \
        struct irq_pin_list *entry = irq_2_pin + irq;                   \
                                                                        \
        for (;;) {                                                      \
                unsigned int reg;                                       \
                pin = entry->pin;                                       \
                if (pin == -1)                                          \
                        break;                                          \
                reg = io_apic_read(entry->apic, 0x10 + R + pin*2);      \
                reg ACTION;                                             \
                io_apic_modify(entry->apic, reg);                       \
                if (!entry->next)                                       \
                        break;                                          \
                entry = irq_2_pin + entry->next;                        \
        }                                                               \
        FINAL;                                                          \
}

ACTION is supposed to be an assignment to reg; in clustered hierarchical
destination format this is not a bitmask as assumed by 1 << entry->cpu.


Matt, Mike, please comment.


Cheers,
Bill

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-06-18  7:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-06-13 19:21 [PATCH] 2.4-ac: sparc64 support for O(1) scheduler Robert Love
2002-06-14  4:25 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-14 17:32   ` Robert Love
2002-06-15 13:22     ` David S. Miller
2002-06-20 19:42       ` Alan Cox
2002-06-16 15:19     ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-16 17:00       ` [patch] 2.4.19-pre10-ac2: O(1) scheduler merge, -A3 Ingo Molnar
2002-06-16 23:57         ` Robert Love
2002-06-17  0:13           ` J.A. Magallon
2002-06-17  4:28             ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-17  0:15           ` Robert Love
2002-06-17  3:49             ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-17  3:57               ` Robert Love
2002-06-17  4:07                 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-17  4:02               ` Robert Love
2002-06-17  4:26                 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-17  4:49                 ` [patch] 2.5.22 current scheduler bits #1 Ingo Molnar
2002-06-17  3:24           ` [patch] 2.4.19-pre10-ac2: O(1) scheduler merge, -A3 Ingo Molnar
2002-06-17  3:35             ` Robert Love
2002-06-17  4:01               ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-17  7:50             ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-06-17  8:32               ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-17  8:23                 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-06-17  9:00                   ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-17  9:34                     ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-06-18  7:16                     ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2002-06-19  1:05                       ` Matthew Dobson
2002-06-20 20:22                         ` Andrew Theurer
2002-06-24  0:16                       ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-06-17 16:26             ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-17  4:51           ` Toshiba PCToPIC97 PC Card freeze in 2.4.18 Stephen Satchell
2002-06-16 23:45       ` [PATCH] 2.4-ac: sparc64 support for O(1) scheduler Robert Love
2002-06-17  5:28         ` David S. Miller
2002-06-17 21:18           ` Robert Love
2002-06-14 22:00   ` Thomas Duffy
2002-06-15 13:35     ` David S. Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020618071626.GO22961@holomorphy.com \
    --to=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=cleverdj@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=hbaum@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rml@mvista.com \
    --cc=zwane@linux.realnet.co.sz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox