From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 09:23:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 09:23:15 -0400 Received: from scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.49]:9183 "EHLO scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 09:23:14 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 09:24:57 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 IDE 91 Message-ID: <20020618132457.GA30830@rushmore> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: rwhron@earthlink.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Is it reproducible? > tiobench had a similar livelock in 2.5.19, 2.5.19 + 2 versions of > wli's lazy-buddy allocator, 2.5.20, 2.5.21 2.5.22 completes all the tests, including tiobench. :) -- Randy Hron http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/