* Oops on 2.5.23 and IDE
@ 2002-06-19 16:15 Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-06-19 18:21 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Zwane Mwaikambo @ 2002-06-19 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel; +Cc: Martin Dalecki
Hi Martin,
IDE seems to be doing odd things.
>>EIP; c0117318 <schedule+28/4f0> <=====
Trace; c0117c6a <wait_for_completion+11a/1d0>
Trace; c0117820 <default_wake_function+0/40>
Trace; c0117820 <default_wake_function+0/40>
Trace; c022e1ae <ide_do_drive_cmd+18e/1b0>
Trace; c01bc082 <vsnprintf+2a2/420>
Trace; c022e439 <ide_raw_taskfile+59/60>
Trace; c02302f4 <do_recalibrate+54/70>
Trace; c022e1d0 <special_intr+0/210>
Trace; c0234e75 <ide_dma_intr+115/120>
Trace; c0231138 <ata_irq_request+148/230>
Trace; c0234d60 <ide_dma_intr+0/120>
int ide_do_drive_cmd()
{
[...]
if (action == ide_wait) {
wait_for_completion(&wait); /* wait for it to be serviced */
return rq->errors ? -EIO : 0; /* return -EIO if errors */
}
[...]
}
Was that function really designed to be called from interrupt context?
Cheers,
Zwane Mwaikambo
--
http://function.linuxpower.ca
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Oops on 2.5.23 and IDE
2002-06-19 16:15 Oops on 2.5.23 and IDE Zwane Mwaikambo
@ 2002-06-19 18:21 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2002-06-19 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zwane Mwaikambo; +Cc: Linux Kernel, Martin Dalecki
On Wed, Jun 19 2002, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> IDE seems to be doing odd things.
>
> >>EIP; c0117318 <schedule+28/4f0> <=====
> Trace; c0117c6a <wait_for_completion+11a/1d0>
> Trace; c0117820 <default_wake_function+0/40>
> Trace; c0117820 <default_wake_function+0/40>
> Trace; c022e1ae <ide_do_drive_cmd+18e/1b0>
> Trace; c01bc082 <vsnprintf+2a2/420>
> Trace; c022e439 <ide_raw_taskfile+59/60>
> Trace; c02302f4 <do_recalibrate+54/70>
> Trace; c022e1d0 <special_intr+0/210>
> Trace; c0234e75 <ide_dma_intr+115/120>
> Trace; c0231138 <ata_irq_request+148/230>
> Trace; c0234d60 <ide_dma_intr+0/120>
>
>
> int ide_do_drive_cmd()
> {
> [...]
> if (action == ide_wait) {
> wait_for_completion(&wait); /* wait for it to be serviced */
> return rq->errors ? -EIO : 0; /* return -EIO if errors */
> }
> [...]
> }
>
> Was that function really designed to be called from interrupt context?
With action other than ide_wait sure, using ide_wait of course not.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-06-19 18:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-06-19 16:15 Oops on 2.5.23 and IDE Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-06-19 18:21 ` Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox