From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 10:20:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 10:20:31 -0400 Received: from n123.ols.wavesec.net ([209.151.19.123]:10880 "EHLO bug.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 10:20:29 -0400 Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 20:01:09 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Matti Aarnio Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Chinese subscribers, and bad firewalls... Message-ID: <20020622180108.GA105@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20020617003542.N19520@mea-ext.zmailer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020617003542.N19520@mea-ext.zmailer.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > What is this product being used in China, I have no idea. > Perhaps it has no easy latin alphabet compatible name at all. > > Can anybody tell me ? Or better, raise the attention of the vendor, > and have this misbehaviour publicly acknowledged, and fixed ? Is it "great china firewall"? China wants to restricts internet, and they have nation-sized firewall in there. AFAICS it was Cisco modified for their needs. Pavel -- (about SSSCA) "I don't say this lightly. However, I really think that the U.S. no longer is classifiable as a democracy, but rather as a plutocracy." --hpa