From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: "Christopher E. Brown" <cbrown@woods.net>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>,
"Griffiths, Richard A" <richard.a.griffiths@intel.com>,
"'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@zip.com.au>,
mgross@unix-os.sc.intel.com, "'Jens Axboe'" <axboe@suse.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: ext3 performance bottleneck as the number of spindles gets large
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 23:35:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020623063543.GH25360@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206222350070.30350-100000@spruce.woods.net>
On Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 12:00:01AM -0600, Christopher E. Brown wrote:
> However, multiple busses are *rare* on x86. There are alot of chained
> busses via PCI to PCI bridge, but few systems with 2 or more PCI
> busses of any type with parallel access to the CPU.
NUMA-Q has them.
Cheers,
Bill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-23 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-20 21:50 ext3 performance bottleneck as the number of spindles gets la rge Griffiths, Richard A
2002-06-21 7:58 ` ext3 performance bottleneck as the number of spindles gets large Andrew Morton
2002-06-21 18:46 ` mgross
2002-06-21 19:26 ` Chris Mason
2002-06-21 19:56 ` Andrew Morton
2002-06-23 4:02 ` Christopher E. Brown
2002-06-23 4:33 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-06-23 6:00 ` Christopher E. Brown
2002-06-23 6:35 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2002-06-23 7:29 ` [Lse-tech] " Dave Hansen
2002-06-23 7:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-06-23 7:45 ` Dave Hansen
2002-06-23 7:55 ` Christopher E. Brown
2002-06-23 8:11 ` David Lang
2002-06-23 8:31 ` Dave Hansen
2002-06-23 16:21 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-06-23 17:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-21 22:03 Duc Vianney
2002-06-21 23:11 ` Andrew Morton
2002-06-22 0:19 ` kwijibo
2002-06-22 8:10 ` kwijibo
2002-06-20 16:24 [Lse-tech] Re: ext3 performance bottleneck as the number of s pindles " Gross, Mark
2002-06-20 21:11 ` [Lse-tech] Re: ext3 performance bottleneck as the number of spindles " Andrew Morton
[not found] <59885C5E3098D511AD690002A5072D3C057B499E@orsmsx111.jf.intel.com>
2002-06-20 16:10 ` Dave Hansen
2002-06-20 20:47 ` John Hawkes
2002-06-19 21:29 mgross
2002-06-20 0:54 ` Andrew Morton
2002-06-20 4:09 ` [Lse-tech] " Dave Hansen
2002-06-20 6:03 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-06-20 6:53 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020623063543.GH25360@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=cbrown@woods.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mgross@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
--cc=richard.a.griffiths@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox