From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 06:52:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 06:52:51 -0400 Received: from kweetal.tue.nl ([131.155.2.7]:55316 "EHLO kweetal.tue.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 06:52:51 -0400 Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 12:52:41 +0200 From: Andries Brouwer To: Nicolas Bougues Cc: unlisted-recipients:(no To-header on input), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Problems with wait queues Message-ID: <20020626105241.GA19512@win.tue.nl> References: <20020626103243.GA4797@kiwi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020626103243.GA4797@kiwi> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 12:32:43PM +0200, Nicolas Bougues wrote: > Does anybody have any idea on what I may have done wrong, and why > would loadavg increase when vmstat show no activity ? loadavg does not report what you think it reports