From: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Brad Hards <bhards@bigpond.net.au>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 2.4.19-rc1] Fix dependancies on keybdev.o
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 14:23:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020626212307.GU3489@opus.bloom.county> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200206270658.04695.bhards@bigpond.net.au>
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 06:58:04AM +1000, Brad Hards wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 00:46, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 12:36:24PM +1000, Brad Hards wrote:
> > > 2. Move keyboard handling code to input subsystem
> >
> > I think that will work out the best. How's the attached look? It moves
> > drivers/input/Config.in inside of drivers/char/Config.in and then fixes
> > arches which had both. (Lightly tested from xconfig[1] for all arches
> > which got changed).
>
> I'm opposed to further junk going into drivers/char. It is already an
> incomprehensible mess of unrelated code.
drivers/char/Config.in isn't too bad right now. If you skip over the
horrific mess that is serial support, anyhow. Perhaps moving some of
the arch-specific questions out to arch/$(ARCH)/config.in
> Actually, I've got another idea, based on some stuff that I've been working on
> for the ACPI "its not just power management" issue.
>
> If you need to set something in drivers/input (per your original patch) that
> depends on things that are set in drivers/char (or drivers/usb, anything that
> comes later), then split the Config.in into two sections. One section
> contains the normal Config.in user-selectable options, and a second
> drivers/input/Config-post.in, that is sourced in at the end of
> arch/foo/config.in and contains only automated Config.in dependancies (ie
> define_bool) but no user selectable options.
>
> Does this make sense? If not, I'll try for a patch that shows it later this
> morning.
I don't think this makes sense for input however, unless we kill off
drivers/input/Config.in (and for sh/m68k/sparc64 just paste the lines
in) and merge it into drivers/char/Config.in (CONFIG_INPUT,
CONFIG_INPUT_{KEYB,MOUSE,EV}DEV) and drivers/char/joystick/Config.in
(CONFIG_INPUT_JOYSTICK). I wouldn't be opposed to doing that...
And for USB (CONFIG_INPUT'ed) joysticks we aren't any worse off, and
perhaps we could even move those into a USB menu.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-26 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-25 16:06 [PATCH/RFC 2.4.19-rc1] Fix dependancies on keybdev.o Tom Rini
2002-06-26 2:36 ` Brad Hards
2002-06-26 14:46 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-26 20:58 ` Brad Hards
2002-06-26 21:23 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2002-06-26 23:43 ` Brad Hards
2002-06-26 23:54 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020626212307.GU3489@opus.bloom.county \
--to=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhards@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox