From: Jesse Pollard <pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil>
To: dax@gurulabs.com, Michael Kerrisk <m.kerrisk@gmx.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Status of capabilities?
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 07:57:19 -0500 (CDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200206271257.HAA61267@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1025157926.1652.35.camel@mentor>
Dax Kelson <dax@gurulabs.com>:
>
> On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 06:40, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>
> > What's still missing in 2.4, as far as I can see after reading the sources,
> > is the ability to set capabilities on executable files so that a process
> > gains those privileges when executing the file. I recall seeing some
> > information somewhere saying this wasn't possible / wasn't going to happen
> > for ext2. Is it on the drawing board for any file system?
>
> The 2.5 VFS supports Extended Attributes (since 2.5.3). I think the plan
> was use EAs to store capabilities. So I believe that the infrastructure
> is in place, someone with the proper skills just needs to:
>
> 1. Define how capabilities will be stored as a EA
> 2. Teach fs/exec.c to use the capabilities stored with the file
> 3. Write lscap(1)
> 4. Write chcap(1)
> 5. Audit/fix all SUID root binaries to use capabilities
> 6. Set appropriate capabilities with for each with chcap(1) and then:
> # find / -type f -perm -4000 -user root -exec chmod u-s {} \;
> 7. Party and snicker in the general direction of that OS with the slogan
> "One remote hole in the default install, in nearly 6 years!"
Actually, I think most of that work has already been done by the Linux
Security Module project (well, except #7).
see:
http://lsm.immunix.org/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesse I Pollard, II
Email: pollard@navo.hpc.mil
Any opinions expressed are solely my own.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-27 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-26 12:40 Status of capabilities? Michael Kerrisk
2002-06-27 6:05 ` Dax Kelson
2002-06-27 12:57 ` Jesse Pollard [this message]
2002-06-27 20:54 ` Chris Wright
2002-06-27 22:52 ` Dax Kelson
2002-07-06 20:56 ` Chris Wright
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-28 13:20 Jesse Pollard
2002-05-10 6:28 Michael Kerrisk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200206271257.HAA61267@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil \
--to=pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil \
--cc=dax@gurulabs.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.kerrisk@gmx.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox