From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: alex@PolesApart.wox.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: 2.4.19-pre10-ac2 bug in page_alloc.c:131
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 04:18:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020701021854.GA829@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020624.080409.79615643.davem@redhat.com>
Hi!
> Maybe I got it the wrong way, but it seems to me that from your point of
> view, as long as proprietary driver is in use, it's not anyone else
> problem but to the vendor, even if the bug could happen to be in the
> kernel, is that right? If so, everyone else in this list who could try
> to fix this (again assuming it could be something related to the kernel
> and not to the proprietary driver) necessarily share your oppinion? (I'm
> not flaming in here, just trying to get the path).
>
> This has to do with facts, not opinions. Since we lack the source to
> their drivers, we have no idea if some bug in their driver is
> scribbling over (ie. corrupting) memory. It is therefore an unknown
> which makes it a waste of time for us to pursue the bug report.
Actually, then you should taint kernel for starting X, too... Anything
running with root priviledges can scribble over memory.
Pavel
PS: Not that I'm advocating nvidia junk, and of course it is way
easier to cause corruption from kernel.
--
(about SSSCA) "I don't say this lightly. However, I really think that the U.S.
no longer is classifiable as a democracy, but rather as a plutocracy." --hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-01 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200206231945.27717.markus_schoder@yahoo.de>
2002-06-24 12:23 ` PROBLEM: 2.4.19-pre10-ac2 bug in page_alloc.c:131 Alexandre P. Nunes
2002-06-24 14:17 ` Alan Cox
2002-06-24 15:06 ` Alexandre P. Nunes
2002-06-24 15:04 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-24 16:47 ` Alexandre P. Nunes
2002-07-01 2:18 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2002-07-02 1:39 ` Horst von Brand
2002-07-02 16:29 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-02 17:04 ` Alexandre P. Nunes
2002-07-02 23:25 ` Matthias Andree
2002-06-24 15:18 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-06-23 1:13 Alexandre Pereira Nunes
2002-06-23 11:07 ` Diego Calleja
2002-06-23 11:40 ` Alexandre Pereira Nunes
2002-06-26 20:47 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-06-26 21:00 ` Bongani
2002-06-26 21:45 ` khromy
2002-06-26 21:54 ` Robert Love
2002-06-26 22:12 ` Bongani
2002-06-26 22:08 ` Robert Love
2002-06-27 0:54 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-06-27 15:40 ` Robert Love
2002-06-27 15:47 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-06-27 18:29 ` Alexandre P. Nunes
2002-06-27 18:31 ` Robert Love
2002-06-27 18:53 ` Alexandre P. Nunes
2002-06-27 20:05 ` J Sloan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020701021854.GA829@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=alex@PolesApart.wox.org \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox