From: Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2.5.22] simple ide-tape.c and ide-floppy.c cleanup
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 17:51:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020703155113.GA26299@zombie.inka.de> (raw)
Why not another way round? Just make the ide-scsi driver be prefered,
and hack ide-scsi a bit to simulate the cdrom and adv.floppy devices
that are expected as /dev/hd* by some user's configuration?
To be honest - why keep ide-[cd,floppy,tape] when they can be almost
completely replaced with ide-scsi? I know about only few cdrom devices
that are broken (== not ATAPI compliant) but can be used with
workarounds in the current ide-cd driver. OTOH many users do already
need ide-scsi to access cd recorders and similar hardware, so they would
benefit much more from having ide-scsi as default than few users of
broken "atapi" drives.
Other operating systems did switch to constitent (scsi-based) way of
accessing all kinds of removable media drivers. Why does Linux have to
keep a kludge, written years ago without having a good concept?
Gruss/Regards,
Eduard.
--
Ich glaube nicht, daß man dieses Stück in Software umgesetzte Scheiße über-
haupt mieser machen kann, als es sowieso schon ist. Das dürfte das einzige
Programm sein, das vom Verhalten und seinen Anwendern her schlimmer als XP
auf einem Amiga ist. - Manuel Richardt in ka.talk ueber Outlook Express
next reply other threads:[~2002-07-03 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-03 15:51 Eduard Bloch [this message]
2002-07-03 18:03 ` [PATCH 2.5.22] simple ide-tape.c and ide-floppy.c cleanup Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-07-08 4:23 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-07-08 20:33 ` Paul Bristow
2002-07-08 21:41 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-07-08 21:56 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-07-09 12:28 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-07-09 12:46 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-03 22:21 James Bottomley
[not found] <mailman.1025711581.26152.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2002-07-03 20:18 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-07-03 22:09 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-06-19 21:45 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-06-20 5:42 ` Jens Axboe
2002-06-20 9:16 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-20 9:19 ` Jens Axboe
2002-06-20 9:22 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-20 16:37 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-06-20 16:41 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-20 16:44 ` Jens Axboe
2002-06-20 16:50 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-06-20 17:26 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020703155113.GA26299@zombie.inka.de \
--to=edi@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox