From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>,
Rob Landley <landley@trommello.org>,
Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>,
"J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>,
Linux-Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [OKS] O(1) scheduler in 2.4
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 02:12:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020705091227.GS22961@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207040846340.3309-100000@e2>
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 08:56:01AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> are these hard numbers? I havent seen much hard data yet from real-life
> servers using the O(1) scheduler. There was lots of feedback from
> desktop-class systems that behave better, but servers used to be pretty
> good with the previous scheduler as well.
I seem to recall some testing having been done demonstrating such
differences. I'll ask around when I get back from vacation, though I'll
confess it's far afield from my usual interests.
Cheers,
Bill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-05 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-01 17:52 [OKS] O(1) scheduler in 2.4 Bill Davidsen
2002-07-01 18:12 ` Tom Rini
2002-07-01 23:44 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-07-02 2:48 ` Tom Rini
2002-07-03 1:11 ` Rob Landley
2002-07-03 7:30 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-07-03 8:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-07-04 3:36 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-04 6:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-07-04 7:36 ` J Sloan
2002-07-05 6:18 ` Andrew Rodland
2002-07-05 6:56 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-07-05 7:02 ` Andrew Rodland
2002-07-05 9:12 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2002-07-04 18:08 ` Rob Landley
2002-07-05 11:17 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-05 15:09 ` Rob Landley
2002-07-06 4:31 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-06 23:10 ` Rob Landley
2002-07-07 10:55 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-02 16:05 ` venom
2002-07-02 16:53 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-07-02 14:46 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-02 15:12 ` Tom Rini
2002-07-04 4:02 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-04 4:17 ` Tom Rini
2002-07-01 18:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-07-02 15:07 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020705091227.GS22961@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=jamagallon@able.es \
--cc=landley@trommello.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox