From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Rob Landley <landley@trommello.org>,
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>,
Linux-Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [OKS] Kernel release management
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 08:45:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020706124534.GA476@think.thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020704131654.B11601@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 01:16:54PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 09:19:41PM -0400, Rob Landley wrote:
> > Look at the pressure to get stuff into 2.4 when it's already in 2.5. Because
> > 2.4 is what people are actually using, and 2.5 is really just for os
> > development and testing (and general playing with) at this point.
>
> If stuff in 2.5 wasn't soo broken (looking at IDE here) then more people
> would be using it, and less people would be wanting the 2.5 features back
> ported to 2.4. IMHO, at the moment 2.5 has a major problem. It is not
> getting the testing it deserves because things like IDE and such like
> aren't reasonably stable enough.
And the obvious answer to this is a backport of the 2.4 IDE subsystem
to 2.5..... CONFIG_IDE_WONT_FIND_NEW_E2FSCK_BUGS, anyone? :-)
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-07 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-01 18:25 [OKS] Kernel release management Bill Davidsen
2002-07-01 18:56 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-07-01 19:24 ` Justin M. Forbes
2002-07-02 15:13 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-03 1:19 ` Rob Landley
2002-07-03 11:10 ` Matt Bernstein
2002-07-04 12:16 ` Russell King
2002-07-06 12:45 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2002-07-07 19:37 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-07-04 12:02 ` Russell King
2002-07-04 13:33 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-04 14:32 ` Russell King
2002-07-03 15:34 ` Dave Jones
2002-07-03 14:24 ` Rob Landley
2002-07-04 2:18 ` jw schultz
2002-07-04 12:21 ` Russell King
2002-07-06 12:17 ` Dave Jones
2002-07-04 3:44 ` Bill Davidsen
[not found] <Pine.LNX.3.96.1020702110848.27954D-100000@gatekeeper.tmr.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <200207030718.g637I0L145202@pimout2-int.prodigy.net.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20020704131654.B11601@flint.arm.linux.org.uk.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-07-04 13:35 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020706124534.GA476@think.thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=landley@trommello.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox