From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 15:18:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 15:18:03 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:17931 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 15:18:02 -0400 Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 21:20:41 +0200 From: Dave Jones To: Alexander Viro Cc: Neil Brown , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] raid kdev_t cleanups (part 1) Message-ID: <20020707212041.A20087@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Alexander Viro , Neil Brown , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <15653.9247.110730.4440@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from viro@math.psu.edu on Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 01:56:38AM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 01:56:38AM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote: > Now, if some brave soul would sanitize the horrors > in lvm*.c... (hint, hint) With LVM2 waiting in the wings, is it worth doing the substantial amount of work needed to get it into decent shape ? As long as the lvm2 folks can get their act together before the freeze (which seems quite likely if the rumours about the new lvm code are true), it may be better for those wanting to hack on LVM to help out on getting LVM2 into a mergable state. Comments ? Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs