From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Cc: adam@yggdrasil.com, R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Rusty's module talk at the Kernel Summit
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:45:55 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020710.194555.88475708.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020711124830.26e2388b.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:48:30 +1000
For God's sake, WHY? Look at what you're doing to your TLB (and if you
made IPv4 a removable module, I'll bet real money you have a bug unless
you are *very* *very* clever).
Modules can be mapped using a large PTE mapping.
I've been meaning to do this on sparc64 for a long
time.
So this TLB argument alone is not sufficient :-)
I do concur on the "ipv4 as module is difficult to
get correct" argument however.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-11 2:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-04 17:24 Rusty's module talk at the Kernel Summit Adam J. Richter
2002-07-11 2:48 ` Rusty Russell
2002-07-11 2:45 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-07-11 3:30 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-11 5:13 ` Rusty Russell
2002-07-11 6:37 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-11 7:14 ` Rusty Russell
2002-07-11 10:54 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-11 17:37 ` Roman Zippel
2002-07-11 18:01 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-11 18:50 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-17 18:16 ` bill davidsen
2002-07-17 19:35 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-11 18:28 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-11 19:48 ` Roman Zippel
2002-07-11 20:29 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-11 23:37 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-12 1:54 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-12 3:53 ` Rusty Russell
2002-07-12 6:49 ` Kai Henningsen
2002-07-12 11:30 ` Roman Zippel
2002-07-12 0:00 ` Rusty Russell
2002-07-12 6:57 ` Kai Henningsen
2002-07-19 0:19 ` Richard Gooch
2002-07-22 16:29 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-23 4:37 ` Richard Gooch
2002-07-11 4:02 ` Cort Dougan
2002-07-11 4:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-07-11 4:46 ` Cort Dougan
2002-07-11 2:55 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-07-11 3:01 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-07-11 5:16 ` Rusty Russell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-11 5:44 Adam J. Richter
2002-07-11 5:07 Adam J. Richter
2002-07-03 15:53 Adam J. Richter
2002-07-03 17:07 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-07-03 18:46 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-07-03 23:25 ` Keith Owens
2002-07-03 23:09 ` Keith Owens
2002-07-03 7:31 Adam J. Richter
2002-07-03 8:54 ` Rogier Wolff
2002-07-03 12:27 ` Keith Owens
2002-07-03 14:10 ` Keith Owens
2002-07-01 17:20 Adam J. Richter
2002-07-01 16:12 Adam J. Richter
2002-07-01 17:02 ` jlnance
2002-07-03 5:01 ` Keith Owens
2002-07-01 8:45 Keith Owens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020710.194555.88475708.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl \
--cc=adam@yggdrasil.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox