The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Thomas Tonino <ttonino@users.sf.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
Subject: Re: Terrible VM in 2.4.11+?
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:49:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020710084904.GH3185@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D2BF3CC.3040409@users.sf.net>

On Wed, Jul 10 2002, Thomas Tonino wrote:
> J.A. Magallon wrote:
> 
> >Seriously, if you have that kind of problems, take the -aa kernel and use 
> >it.
> >I use it regularly and it behaves as one would expect, and fast.
> >And please, report your results...
> 
> I run a 2 cpu server with 16 disks and around 5 megabytes of writes a 
> second. With plain 2.4.18 (using the feral.com qlogic driver) and 2GB 
> ram, this seemed okay. Upgrading to 4GB ram slowed the system down, and 
> normal shell commands became quite unresponsive with 4GB.
> 
> So we built a second server, with 2.4.19-pre9-aa2 using the qlogic 
> driver in the kernel. That driver needs patching, as it will otherwise 
> get stuck in a 'no handle slots' condition. Used a patch that I posted 
> to linux-scsi a while ago.

That's probably not just a mm issue, if you use stock 2.4.18 with 4GB
ram you will spend oodles of time bounce buffering i/o. 2.4.19-pre9-aa2
includes the block-highmem stuff, which enables direct-to-highmem i/o,
if you enabled the CONFIG_HIGHIO option.

In short, not an apples-to-apples comparison :-)

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-10  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-08 22:11 Terrible VM in 2.4.11+? Lukas Hejtmanek
2002-07-08 22:37 ` Austin Gonyou
2002-07-08 22:50   ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2002-07-08 22:58     ` J.A. Magallon
2002-07-08 23:58       ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2002-07-09 10:48       ` Terrible VM in 2.4.11+ again? Lukas Hejtmanek
2002-07-10 16:34         ` Andrea Arcangeli
     [not found]           ` <20020801113124.GA755@mail.muni.cz>
     [not found]             ` <20020801140348.GM1132@dualathlon.random>
     [not found]               ` <20020801141940.GB755@mail.muni.cz>
2002-08-01 15:39                 ` Terrible VM in 2.4.19rc3aa4 once again? Andrea Arcangeli
     [not found]                   ` <20020801220143.GC755@mail.muni.cz>
2002-08-01 22:14                     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-07-10  8:43       ` Terrible VM in 2.4.11+? Thomas Tonino
2002-07-10  8:49         ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2002-07-10 13:52           ` Thomas Tonino
2002-07-10 16:41             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-07-10 12:34         ` Adrian Bunk
2002-07-08 23:04     ` Austin Gonyou
2002-07-08 23:27 ` khromy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020710084904.GH3185@suse.de \
    --to=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=jamagallon@able.es \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ttonino@users.sf.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox