From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Thomas Tonino <ttonino@users.sf.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
Subject: Re: Terrible VM in 2.4.11+?
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:49:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020710084904.GH3185@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D2BF3CC.3040409@users.sf.net>
On Wed, Jul 10 2002, Thomas Tonino wrote:
> J.A. Magallon wrote:
>
> >Seriously, if you have that kind of problems, take the -aa kernel and use
> >it.
> >I use it regularly and it behaves as one would expect, and fast.
> >And please, report your results...
>
> I run a 2 cpu server with 16 disks and around 5 megabytes of writes a
> second. With plain 2.4.18 (using the feral.com qlogic driver) and 2GB
> ram, this seemed okay. Upgrading to 4GB ram slowed the system down, and
> normal shell commands became quite unresponsive with 4GB.
>
> So we built a second server, with 2.4.19-pre9-aa2 using the qlogic
> driver in the kernel. That driver needs patching, as it will otherwise
> get stuck in a 'no handle slots' condition. Used a patch that I posted
> to linux-scsi a while ago.
That's probably not just a mm issue, if you use stock 2.4.18 with 4GB
ram you will spend oodles of time bounce buffering i/o. 2.4.19-pre9-aa2
includes the block-highmem stuff, which enables direct-to-highmem i/o,
if you enabled the CONFIG_HIGHIO option.
In short, not an apples-to-apples comparison :-)
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-10 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-08 22:11 Terrible VM in 2.4.11+? Lukas Hejtmanek
2002-07-08 22:37 ` Austin Gonyou
2002-07-08 22:50 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2002-07-08 22:58 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-07-08 23:58 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2002-07-09 10:48 ` Terrible VM in 2.4.11+ again? Lukas Hejtmanek
2002-07-10 16:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
[not found] ` <20020801113124.GA755@mail.muni.cz>
[not found] ` <20020801140348.GM1132@dualathlon.random>
[not found] ` <20020801141940.GB755@mail.muni.cz>
2002-08-01 15:39 ` Terrible VM in 2.4.19rc3aa4 once again? Andrea Arcangeli
[not found] ` <20020801220143.GC755@mail.muni.cz>
2002-08-01 22:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-07-10 8:43 ` Terrible VM in 2.4.11+? Thomas Tonino
2002-07-10 8:49 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2002-07-10 13:52 ` Thomas Tonino
2002-07-10 16:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-07-10 12:34 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-07-08 23:04 ` Austin Gonyou
2002-07-08 23:27 ` khromy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020710084904.GH3185@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=jamagallon@able.es \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ttonino@users.sf.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox