From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:45:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:45:02 -0400 Received: from angband.namesys.com ([212.16.7.85]:4224 "HELO angband.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:45:00 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:47:44 +0400 From: Oleg Drokin To: Christoph Hellwig , Steven Cole , Vitaly Fertman , reiserfs-list@namesys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti , Alan Cox Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: reiserfsprogs release Message-ID: <20020710184744.A1939@namesys.com> References: <200206251829.25799.vitaly@namesys.com> <20020625165254.GA30301@matrix.wg> <200206261317.10813.vitaly@namesys.com> <200207101206.48370.vitaly@namesys.com> <1026311034.7074.76.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> <20020710153801.A8570@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020710153801.A8570@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 03:38:01PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > the latest reiserfsprogs-3.6.2 is available on our ftp site. > > Is the following patch to Documentation/Changes appropriate? > Does reiserfs in 2.4.19-pre require that version? if yes it would be No. > very bad (2.4 is not supposed to need newer userlevel during the series) Well, sometimes you want to upgrade not because it is required, but because of bugfixed you will get out of newer version. Bye, Oleg