public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: c0330 <c0330@yingwa.edu.hk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Future of Kernel tree 2.0 ............
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 06:37:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020713133743.GG21551@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E17TUXf-0000Ow-00@ited.yingwa.edu.hk>

On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 09:35:03PM +0000, c0330 wrote:
>   Will kernel tree 2.0 stop developing and regard historical after
> the release of 2.6?  I think we would put our focus on much more
> newer kernel. And I found this may confuse the newbies, because they
> don't know much about versioning in Kernel.
>   In nowsdays, there are less less compputers using 2.0. We should
> push them to upgrade, so I think stop developing 2.0 is better, in
> my opinion

I don't see why. If 2.0 is what works best for someone there's no
reason to push them to use something else.


Cheers,
Bill

  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-13 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-13 21:35 Future of Kernel tree 2.0 c0330
2002-07-13 13:37 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2002-07-13 13:41 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-13 13:43 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-07-13 16:07   ` Gerhard Mack
2002-07-13 17:11     ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-14  0:42   ` Erik Andersen
2002-07-13 14:53 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-13 15:34   ` Stephen Frost
2002-07-13 15:36 ` Jose Luis Domingo Lopez
2002-07-13 16:28 ` Austin Gonyou
2002-07-13 23:49   ` David Weinehall
2002-07-15  4:07     ` Austin Gonyou
2002-07-15 19:22     ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-15 19:42       ` Jeff Dike
2002-07-13 23:37 ` David Weinehall
2002-07-15  2:16   ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020713133743.GG21551@holomorphy.com \
    --to=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=c0330@yingwa.edu.hk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox