From: Ryan Cumming <ryan@completely.kicks-ass.org>
To: Rob Landley <landley@trommello.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Alright, I give up. What does the "i" in "inode" stand for?
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 06:09:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200207190609.13684.ryan@completely.kicks-ass.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200207190619.g6J6Jo2112432@pimout5-int.prodigy.net>
On July 18, 2002 17:21, Rob Landley wrote:
> That's probably good enough for me, actually. Now my NEXT unanswered
> question is why the heck Darpa's "Information Awareness Office" has a
> picture of the Bavarian Illuminati in its logo, but I doubt that's
> something this list can help me with. Me, I would have picked the gnomes
> of zurich. Or the UFOs, for the second attack. Or in the expansion pack,
> The Networks, since transferrable power is so useful anyway...
That one's easier. The pyramid with the radiant eye is actually the reverse of
the Great Seal of the United States of America, dreamed up by a bunch of
committees shortly after the US gained independence. It also appears on the
one dollar bill. And because it was designed by committee, it's about as
complex as the POSIX standard.
The pyramid signifies strength and duration. It was an appropriate symbol at
the time, because there was an Egypt fad, and everyone though pyramids and
mummy were really novel. The pyramid has thirteen levels, symbolising the
thirteen original states. The partially completed state of the pyramid is
intended to represent the nation under construction. I guess they crammed 38
more levels in at the very tip.
The single opening eye has always been an artistic symbol of omniscience. This
represents the "God" [1] of the founders, and is referred to in the caption
"Annuit Coeptis". This roughly translates to "It has favoured our
undertakings", meaning that the omniscient eye likes the US. The radial lines
originating at the omniscient eye are supposed to stand for it extending
radiance out in to infinity.
> (P.S. I'm not quite kidding: http://www.darpa.mil/iao/ ).
Now, the symbolism used in the IOA logo is poor at best. The omniscient eye
was never supposed to represent the United States itself, but God [1]. Unless
they're calling themselves God lately, they really broke the metaphor by
having the eye looking over the Earth. It just goes to show that the US was a
lot cooler when it was founded than it is now.
-Ryan
[1] Joseph Campbell suggested that the God referred to by the founders was not
the Christian God, but the "God" of logic and reason. One argument for this
may be that the opening eye is also used to represent the "third eye". The
third eye stands for enlightenment and introspection, which is very
suggestive of the sort of God Joseph Campbell talks about. I haven't done
nearly enough independent research to back that up, though.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-19 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-18 22:33 Alright, I give up. What does the "i" in "inode" stand for? Rob Landley
2002-07-19 4:38 ` Kelledin
2002-07-19 4:38 ` Larry McVoy
2002-07-19 4:45 ` CaT
2002-07-18 23:34 ` Rob Landley
2002-07-19 5:40 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-19 0:21 ` Rob Landley
2002-07-19 12:38 ` Kelledin
2002-07-19 13:09 ` Ryan Cumming [this message]
2002-07-19 7:00 ` dalecki
2002-07-19 19:58 ` Måns Rullgård
2002-07-19 20:17 ` Cort Dougan
2002-07-20 1:06 ` Kelsey Hudson
2002-07-26 14:15 ` [OT] Why Stallman says GNU/Linux (was Re: Alright, I give up. What does the "i" in "inode" stand for?) Rob Landley
2002-07-19 14:20 ` Alright, I give up. What does the "i" in "inode" stand for? yodaiken
2002-07-20 14:22 ` Georg Nikodym
2002-07-20 14:31 ` yodaiken
2002-07-22 13:10 ` Jesse Pollard
2002-07-20 6:01 ` John Kacur
2002-07-19 4:52 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-07-22 22:23 ` Joe DiMartino
2002-07-22 22:49 ` Hiten Pandya
2002-07-25 0:24 ` Daniel Mose
2002-07-25 1:16 ` Andrew Rodland
2002-07-25 2:43 ` jw schultz
2002-07-25 3:18 ` Christian Lavoie
2002-07-25 5:30 ` Ross Vandegrift
2002-07-25 11:08 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-25 6:03 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-26 8:24 ` jbradford
2002-07-28 9:01 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-08-04 15:11 ` Gert Menke
2002-07-26 12:54 ` Rob Landley
2002-07-25 18:06 ` Kevin Buhr
2002-07-26 23:39 ` Daniel Mose
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-19 5:08 Mohamed Ghouse , Gurgaon
2002-07-19 13:21 Nicholas Berry
2002-07-19 13:32 Jesse Pollard
2002-07-30 20:07 ` Mark H. Wood
[not found] <fa.m2aun2v.khulp2@ifi.uio.no>
2002-07-20 2:20 ` Kevin Buhr
2002-07-20 2:51 Kevin Puetz
2002-07-25 13:54 Jesse Pollard
2002-07-30 20:58 Jesse Pollard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200207190609.13684.ryan@completely.kicks-ass.org \
--to=ryan@completely.kicks-ass.org \
--cc=landley@trommello.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox