From: glynis@butterfly.hjsoft.com
To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: still having smp/snat problems (Re: Linux 2.4.19-rc3)
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 00:17:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020720041700.GA8172@butterfly.hjsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207192119380.28216-100000@freak.distro.conectiva>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2144 bytes --]
On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 09:20:49PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (02/07/17 1.630)
> [PATCH] The real netfilter conntrack SMP overrun fix
assuming this should have fixed this:
LIST_DELETE: ip_conntrack_core.c:165
`&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY]'(dd8f2e90) not in &ip_conntrack_hash
[hash_conntrack(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple)].
it doesn't seem to have taken. i see this error and the following
crash when i use these rules:
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j SNAT --to 64.192.31.41
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j SNAT --to 192.168.1.1
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j SNAT --to 127.0.0.1
when i use the masquerading instead of snat, it doesn't exhibit the
error and crash.
here's the info for my _stable_ config on my dual athlon 1800+:
---
If some fields are empty or look unusual you may have an old version.
Compare to the current minimal requirements in Documentation/Changes.
Linux butterfly 2.4.19-rc3 #1 SMP Fri Jul 19 21:30:52 EDT 2002 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux
Gnu C gcc (GCC) 3.1.1 20020703 (Debian prerelease) Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Gnu make 3.79.1
util-linux 2.11n
mount 2.11n
modutils 2.4.15
e2fsprogs 1.27
Linux C Library 2.2.5
Dynamic linker (ldd) 2.2.5
Procps 2.0.7
Net-tools 1.60
Console-tools 0.2.3
Sh-utils 2.0.12
Modules Loaded snd-mixer-oss snd-pcm-oss snd-ens1371 snd-rawmidi snd-seq-device snd-ac97-codec snd-pcm snd-timer snd soundcore ipt_REJECT iptable_filter ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat ip_conntrack ip_tables autofs4 cpia_usb cpia videodev serial af_packet usb-ohci usbcore 3c59x ne2k-pci 8390
---
--
____________________}John Flinchbaugh{______________________
| glynis@hjsoft.com http://www.hjsoft.com/~glynis/ |
~~Powered by Linux: Reboots are for hardware upgrades only~~
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-20 4:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-20 0:20 Linux 2.4.19-rc3 Marcelo Tosatti
2002-07-20 4:17 ` glynis [this message]
2002-07-20 9:51 ` still having smp/snat problems (Re: Linux 2.4.19-rc3) Martin Josefsson
2002-07-22 1:43 ` Rusty Russell
[not found] <002201c2e6e8$ee071d40$0201a8c0@intranet>
2003-03-10 15:03 ` John M Flinchbaugh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020720041700.GA8172@butterfly.hjsoft.com \
--to=glynis@butterfly.hjsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox