public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: glynis@butterfly.hjsoft.com
To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: still having smp/snat problems (Re: Linux 2.4.19-rc3)
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 00:17:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020720041700.GA8172@butterfly.hjsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207192119380.28216-100000@freak.distro.conectiva>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2144 bytes --]

On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 09:20:49PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (02/07/17 1.630)
> 	[PATCH] The real netfilter conntrack SMP overrun fix

assuming this should have fixed this:
LIST_DELETE: ip_conntrack_core.c:165
`&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY]'(dd8f2e90) not in &ip_conntrack_hash
[hash_conntrack(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple)].

it doesn't seem to have taken.   i see this error and the following
crash when i use these rules:
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j SNAT --to 64.192.31.41
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j SNAT --to 192.168.1.1
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j SNAT --to 127.0.0.1

when i use the masquerading instead of snat, it doesn't exhibit the
error and crash.

here's the info for my _stable_ config on my dual athlon 1800+:
---
If some fields are empty or look unusual you may have an old version.
Compare to the current minimal requirements in Documentation/Changes.
 
Linux butterfly 2.4.19-rc3 #1 SMP Fri Jul 19 21:30:52 EDT 2002 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux
 
Gnu C                  gcc (GCC) 3.1.1 20020703 (Debian prerelease) Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Gnu make               3.79.1
util-linux             2.11n
mount                  2.11n
modutils               2.4.15
e2fsprogs              1.27
Linux C Library        2.2.5
Dynamic linker (ldd)   2.2.5
Procps                 2.0.7
Net-tools              1.60
Console-tools          0.2.3
Sh-utils               2.0.12
Modules Loaded         snd-mixer-oss snd-pcm-oss snd-ens1371 snd-rawmidi snd-seq-device snd-ac97-codec snd-pcm snd-timer snd soundcore ipt_REJECT iptable_filter ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat ip_conntrack ip_tables autofs4 cpia_usb cpia videodev serial af_packet usb-ohci usbcore 3c59x ne2k-pci 8390
---
-- 
____________________}John Flinchbaugh{______________________
| glynis@hjsoft.com         http://www.hjsoft.com/~glynis/ |
~~Powered by Linux: Reboots are for hardware upgrades only~~

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-20  4:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-20  0:20 Linux 2.4.19-rc3 Marcelo Tosatti
2002-07-20  4:17 ` glynis [this message]
2002-07-20  9:51   ` still having smp/snat problems (Re: Linux 2.4.19-rc3) Martin Josefsson
2002-07-22  1:43   ` Rusty Russell
     [not found] <002201c2e6e8$ee071d40$0201a8c0@intranet>
2003-03-10 15:03 ` John M Flinchbaugh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020720041700.GA8172@butterfly.hjsoft.com \
    --to=glynis@butterfly.hjsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox