From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Cc: Adam Kropelin <akropel1@rochester.rr.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cpqarray broken since 2.5.19
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 16:09:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020724140912.GM15201@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.30.0207241606090.15605-100000@mion.elka.pw.edu.pl>
On Wed, Jul 24 2002, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 21 2002, Adam Kropelin wrote:
> > > The cpqarray driver seems to have been broken around 2.5.19 with the
> > > blk_start_queue/blk_stop_queue changes. As-is, cpqarray deadlocks the entire
> > > system when it tries to do partition detection. The bits from the 2.5.19 patch
> > > which seem to relate are:
> > >
> > > > @@ -916,6 +915,7 @@
> > > > goto queue_next;
> > > >
> > > > startio:
> > > > + blk_stop_queue(q);
> > > > start_io(h);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > @@ -1066,8 +1066,8 @@
> > > > /*
> > > > * See if we can queue up some more IO
> > > > */
> > > > - do_ida_request(BLK_DEFAULT_QUEUE(MAJOR_NR + h->ctlr));
> > > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(IDA_LOCK(h->ctlr), flags);
> > > > + blk_start_queue(BLK_DEFAULT_QUEUE(MAJOR_NR + h->ctlr));
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > /*
> > >
> > > Simply reverting these changes allows the driver to successfully do
> > > partition detect, but it quickly hangs if any significant amount of
> > > I/O is attempted. The hang in this case seems to just affect processes
> > > trying to do I/O on the array; it is not a whole-system-deadlock.
> > >
> > > Test machine is SMP ppro.
> >
> > Thanks for the report. Could you just kill the spin_lock/unlock in
> > blk_stop_queue() in drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c and see if it works?
> >
> > --
> > Jens Axboe
>
> Jens, the same is in cciss.c.
> Please remove locking from blk_stop_queue() (as you suggested) or intrduce
> unlocking in request_functions.
I just fixed both of them in my BK and pushed it on. I opted for adding
a __blk_stop_queue() as well.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-24 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-21 15:28 cpqarray broken since 2.5.19 Adam Kropelin
2002-07-24 13:39 ` Jens Axboe
2002-07-24 14:07 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-07-24 14:09 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2002-07-24 14:11 ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-24 14:19 ` Jens Axboe
2002-07-24 14:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-07-24 14:44 ` Jens Axboe
2002-07-24 14:46 ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-24 15:15 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-07-24 14:21 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-07-24 14:27 ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-24 14:45 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-07-25 0:32 ` Adam Kropelin
2002-07-25 10:39 ` Jens Axboe
2002-07-26 0:30 ` Adam Kropelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020724140912.GM15201@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=akropel1@rochester.rr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox