From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: martin@dalecki.de
Cc: dalecki@evision.ag, torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.27 spinlock
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 14:40:18 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020724144018.6a92d80a.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D3BE36E.3090001@evision.ag>
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 12:50:22 +0200
Marcin Dalecki <dalecki@evision.ag> wrote:
> - Add missing _raw_write_trylock() definitions for the UP preemption case.
>
> - Replace tons of georgeous macros for the UP preemption case with
> static inline functions. Much nicer to look at and more adequate then
> ({ xxxx }) in this case.
Martin, this patch is wrong, obvious from casual reading:
> -#define spin_trylock_bh(lock) ({ int __r; local_bh_disable();\
> +#define spin_trylock_bh(lock) do { int __r; local_bh_disable();\
> __r = spin_trylock(lock); \
> if (!__r) local_bh_enable(); \
> - __r; })
> + __r; } while (0)
I know you're smarter than this Martin 8)
Rusty.
PS. If you want them re-xmitted to Linus, send to trivial@rustcorp.com.au...
--
there are those who do and those who hang on and you don't see too
many doers quoting their contemporaries. -- Larry McVoy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-24 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-20 19:22 Linux-2.5.27 Linus Torvalds
2002-07-22 10:42 ` [PATCH] 2.5.27 sysctl Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-22 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-07-22 10:56 ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-22 11:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-07-22 11:03 ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-22 12:51 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-22 13:02 ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-22 11:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-07-22 11:19 ` Dave Jones
2002-07-22 11:19 ` bart
2002-07-22 11:21 ` BALBIR SINGH
2002-07-22 12:30 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-22 11:21 ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-22 15:57 ` Daniel Egger
2002-07-22 10:43 ` [PATCH] 2.5.27 devfs Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-22 17:28 ` Richard Gooch
2002-07-22 18:03 ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-22 18:19 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-22 18:46 ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-23 5:04 ` Richard Gooch
2002-07-22 10:45 ` [PATCH] 2.5.27 sched Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-22 10:47 ` [PATCH] 2.5.27 smbiod Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-22 22:29 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-07-22 10:50 ` [PATCH] 2.5.27 spinlock Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-24 4:40 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2002-07-22 10:51 ` [PATCH] 2.5.27 wait Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-22 10:53 ` [PATCH] 2.5.27 enum Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-22 20:01 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-07-23 2:11 ` David S. Miller
2002-07-23 2:55 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-24 6:44 ` James H. Cloos Jr.
2002-07-23 12:27 ` Dave Jones
2002-07-23 12:41 ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-23 13:05 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-07-24 4:49 ` Rusty Russell
2002-07-24 9:47 ` Dave Jones
2002-07-22 14:08 ` [PATCH] 2.5.27 read_write Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-22 16:55 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-22 16:15 ` [PATCH] 2.5.27 read_write - take 2 Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-22 17:04 ` [PATCH] 2.5.27 read_write Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020724144018.6a92d80a.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=dalecki@evision.ag \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin@dalecki.de \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox