From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 00:16:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 00:16:22 -0400 Received: from samba.sourceforge.net ([198.186.203.85]:59584 "HELO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 00:16:21 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: Kiran Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Patch 2.5.25: Ensure xtime_lock and timerlist_lock are on difft cachelines In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 26 Jul 2002 14:53:44 +0530." <20020726145344.A18568@phreaker.net> Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 14:17:30 +1000 Message-Id: <20020727042035.5AA0B413A@lists.samba.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In message <20020726145344.A18568@phreaker.net> you write: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 05:56:19PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > > While it's probably justified in this case, you pay for it in a slight > > increase in size... > > I thought you were of the opinion that "memory is cheap" ;-) Absolutely: if you're trading it for programming time. Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.