From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 13:15:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 13:15:37 -0400 Received: from mout1.freenet.de ([194.97.50.132]:27099 "EHLO mout1.freenet.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 13:15:36 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 19:10:27 +0200 From: Axel Siebenwirth To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: LKCD/kmsgdump for 2.5? Message-ID: <20020730171027.GA278@prester.freenet.de> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20020730142305.GA691@prester.freenet.de> <20020730153523.GA9238@alpha.home.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020730153523.GA9238@alpha.home.local> Organization: hh59.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 04:23:05PM +0200, Axel Siebenwirth wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm tired of handcopying my oopses. I read of something like LKCD and > > kmsgdump but then I saw that these are only available for 2.4. But wouldn't > > something like that be more useful for a development kernel as 2.5? > > of course, you're right. In my case, it's simply because I never > compiled a 2.5 kernel yet. I may port kmsgdump to 2.5 if it doesn't > take too much time. Wouldn't it be wonderful to have something like that in development kernels officially? That way more people could easily help debug the whole thing. Or maybe just an officially maintained patch to current development kernels. Regards, Axel