* 2.4.19.rc3 vs 2.4.17
@ 2002-07-27 18:15 kees
2002-07-27 19:15 ` J Sloan
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: kees @ 2002-07-27 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi
I ran 2.4.19rc3 but my feeling is: Netscape 6.2 and (KDE3) Konqueror
showed a high number of spontaneous crashes. 256MB Ram xosview shows a few
megs of swap used. My pencam program didn't download pictures under
2.4.19rc3 and it does under 2.4.17.
Kees
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.19.rc3 vs 2.4.17
2002-07-27 18:15 2.4.19.rc3 vs 2.4.17 kees
@ 2002-07-27 19:15 ` J Sloan
2002-07-27 21:23 ` kees
2002-07-27 19:41 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-07-30 17:24 ` Greg KH
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: J Sloan @ 2002-07-27 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kees; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hi,
2 comments just from an end-user perspective:
1. netscape 6.2 is nowhere near stable anyway -
I'd recommend either netscape 7-pr1, or a
recent mozilla (1.0, 1.1b or latest nightly)
2. Try one of the "enhanced" kernels, e,g,
2.4.19-rc3-ac2 or 2.4.19-rc3aa1 - they have
bugfixes and performance enhancements
Joe
kees wrote:
>Hi
>I ran 2.4.19rc3 but my feeling is: Netscape 6.2 and (KDE3) Konqueror
>showed a high number of spontaneous crashes. 256MB Ram xosview shows a few
>megs of swap used. My pencam program didn't download pictures under
>2.4.19rc3 and it does under 2.4.17.
>Kees
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.19.rc3 vs 2.4.17
2002-07-27 18:15 2.4.19.rc3 vs 2.4.17 kees
2002-07-27 19:15 ` J Sloan
@ 2002-07-27 19:41 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-07-27 21:22 ` kees
2002-07-30 17:24 ` Greg KH
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Bunk @ 2002-07-27 19:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kees; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, kees wrote:
> Hi
> I ran 2.4.19rc3 but my feeling is: Netscape 6.2 and (KDE3) Konqueror
> showed a high number of spontaneous crashes. 256MB Ram xosview shows a few
>...
You say Netscape and Konqueror crash significantely more often when
running 2.4.19-rc3 compared to running the same applications under 2.4.17?
Let's try to track it down:
- Do only Netscape/Konqueror crash or does X crash or does the whole
computer crash?
- Is there any error message when the browsers crash, if yes which?
- Are there any suspicious messages in /var/log/syslog or
/var/log/messages that might help in tracking this down?
- Is your 2.4.17 a plain ftp.kernel.org kernel or a kernel shipped by your
distribution?
- Do you apply any patches to your kernels?
- Do you ever load non-free kernel modules like e.g. the one from NVidia?
If yes, are your problems reproducible if no non-free modules were
_ever_ loaded since the last reboot?
- Is there anything "special" or unusual with your machine (is it a
laptop, root filesystem is on NFS or XFS, unusual hardware,...)?
> Kees
cu
Adrian
--
You only think this is a free country. Like the US the UK spends a lot of
time explaining its a free country because its a police state.
Alan Cox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.19.rc3 vs 2.4.17
2002-07-27 19:41 ` Adrian Bunk
@ 2002-07-27 21:22 ` kees
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: kees @ 2002-07-27 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrian Bunk; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hi,
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, kees wrote:
>
> > Hi
> > I ran 2.4.19rc3 but my feeling is: Netscape 6.2 and (KDE3) Konqueror
> > showed a high number of spontaneous crashes. 256MB Ram xosview shows a few
> >...
>
> You say Netscape and Konqueror crash significantely more often when
> running 2.4.19-rc3 compared to running the same applications under 2.4.17?
>
> Let's try to track it down:
> - Do only Netscape/Konqueror crash or does X crash or does the whole
> computer crash?
Only the apps, no X crash.
> - Is there any error message when the browsers crash, if yes which?
No messages
> - Are there any suspicious messages in /var/log/syslog or
> /var/log/messages that might help in tracking this down?
No messages, taht was the fisrt thing I looked.
> - Is your 2.4.17 a plain ftp.kernel.org kernel or a kernel shipped by your
> distribution?
Plain kernel from source tree
> - Do you apply any patches to your kernels?
Not this kernel(s)
> - Do you ever load non-free kernel modules like e.g. the one from NVidia?
No
> If yes, are your problems reproducible if no non-free modules were
> _ever_ loaded since the last reboot?
> - Is there anything "special" or unusual with your machine (is it a
> laptop, root filesystem is on NFS or XFS, unusual hardware,...)?
SMP, MSI mobo
Nothing that I can think of. Viewing webpages just did crash the app. very
often , something that got away when switching back to 2.4.17
Java(?)
>
> > Kees
>
> cu
> Adrian
>
> --
>
> You only think this is a free country. Like the US the UK spends a lot of
> time explaining its a free country because its a police state.
> Alan Cox
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.19.rc3 vs 2.4.17
2002-07-27 19:15 ` J Sloan
@ 2002-07-27 21:23 ` kees
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: kees @ 2002-07-27 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: J Sloan; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hi,
I'll give it a try in the next days.
tnx
Kees
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, J Sloan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2 comments just from an end-user perspective:
>
> 1. netscape 6.2 is nowhere near stable anyway -
> I'd recommend either netscape 7-pr1, or a
> recent mozilla (1.0, 1.1b or latest nightly)
>
> 2. Try one of the "enhanced" kernels, e,g,
> 2.4.19-rc3-ac2 or 2.4.19-rc3aa1 - they have
> bugfixes and performance enhancements
>
> Joe
>
> kees wrote:
>
> >Hi
> >I ran 2.4.19rc3 but my feeling is: Netscape 6.2 and (KDE3) Konqueror
> >showed a high number of spontaneous crashes. 256MB Ram xosview shows a few
> >megs of swap used. My pencam program didn't download pictures under
> >2.4.19rc3 and it does under 2.4.17.
> >Kees
> >
> >-
> >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.19.rc3 vs 2.4.17
2002-07-27 18:15 2.4.19.rc3 vs 2.4.17 kees
2002-07-27 19:15 ` J Sloan
2002-07-27 19:41 ` Adrian Bunk
@ 2002-07-30 17:24 ` Greg KH
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2002-07-30 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kees; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 08:15:10PM +0200, kees wrote:
> My pencam program didn't download pictures under
> 2.4.19rc3 and it does under 2.4.17.
This is probably because you now have a USB kernel driver binding to
your pencam device (stv680). Either unload it and then run your
userspace program, or don't build that driver at all.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-07-30 17:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-07-27 18:15 2.4.19.rc3 vs 2.4.17 kees
2002-07-27 19:15 ` J Sloan
2002-07-27 21:23 ` kees
2002-07-27 19:41 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-07-27 21:22 ` kees
2002-07-30 17:24 ` Greg KH
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox