From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: martin@dalecki.de
Cc: Petr Vandrovec <VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IDE from current bk tree, UDMA and two channels...
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:56:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020801095609.GE1096@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D48420F.5050407@evision.ag>
On Wed, Jul 31 2002, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
> >Unfortunately, problem is still here: when kernel was in idedisk_do_request
> >performed on channel 0, IRQ for channel 1 arrived, and this irq found
> >channel 1 DMA engine ready, but drive had DRQ set... oops. Shortly after
> >that IRQ for channel 1 arrived again, but as it was unexpected, nothing
> >happened.
> >
> >I hope that i845 is not simplex device, but first (unexpected) IRQ arrived
> >just when channel 0 code wrote new value to its IDE_SELECT_REG register.
> >Now I even disconnected DVD drive, so it is simple two masters, two
> >channels configuration, but it still happens.
>
> One idea and one experiment I was already thinking about is
> to change do_ide_request to actually *not* select delibreately which
> device do handle. (The big for loop found there...)
> One can instead search for a device on the channel which is matching
> the queue for which do_ide_request() was called.
>
> for (unit = 0; unit < MAX_DEVICES; ++unit) {
> ....
> if (tmp->queue == q) {
> drive = tmp;
> break;
> }
> }
> if (!drive)
> BUG();
hey that sucks :-)
seriously, the better way to do this would be to change the q->queuedata
to be a pointer to drive instead of the channel.
that would work, but I think it would seriously starve the other device
on the same channel.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-01 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-30 19:26 IDE from current bk tree, UDMA and two channels Petr Vandrovec
2002-07-31 20:01 ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-08-01 9:56 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2002-08-01 9:56 ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-08-01 10:05 ` Jens Axboe
2002-08-01 10:33 ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-08-01 10:45 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-01 23:13 Petr Vandrovec
2002-08-02 13:07 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-01 23:00 Petr Vandrovec
2002-08-01 23:05 ` Alexander Viro
2002-08-01 22:53 Petr Vandrovec
2002-08-01 23:02 ` Alexander Viro
2002-08-01 23:54 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] <200208012219.g71MJV109133@penguin.transmeta.com>
2002-08-01 22:45 ` Alexander Viro
2002-08-02 9:10 ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-08-01 22:42 Petr Vandrovec
2002-08-01 22:52 ` Alexander Viro
2002-08-02 9:11 ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-08-01 22:34 Petr Vandrovec
2002-08-01 17:07 Petr Vandrovec
2002-08-01 22:00 ` Petr Vandrovec
2002-08-01 22:13 ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-08-01 22:39 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-30 18:19 Petr Vandrovec
2002-07-31 19:48 ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-30 16:15 Petr Vandrovec
2002-07-30 14:03 Petr Vandrovec
2002-07-30 14:25 ` Marcin Dalecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020801095609.GE1096@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin@dalecki.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox