From: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
To: Ragnar Kj?rstad <kernel@ragnark.vestdata.no>
Cc: jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lftp@uniyar.ac.ru, lftp-devel@uniyar.ac.ru, apiszcz@mitre.org,
ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Nasty ext2fs bug!
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 20:38:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020801183825.GA20265@alpha.home.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020801202718.S20768@vestdata.no>
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 08:27:18PM +0200, Ragnar Kj?rstad wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 11:48:56AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > I find it hard to believe that this would actually make a huge
> > difference, except in the case where the source is throttling bandwidth
> > on a per-connection basis. Either your network is saturated by the
> > transfer, or some point in between is saturated. I could be wrong, of
> > course, and it would be interesting to hear the reasoning behind the
> > speedup.
> If some link is saturated with 1000 connections, you will get 1% of the
> bandwith instead of 0.1% if you use 10 concurrent connections. right?
wrong, you'll get 1% of the connections instead of 0.1%. So you'll be
more responsible for the saturation of some active equipments which
are sensible to connections, but this has nothing to do with the
bandwidth, nor the link.
It may be usefull only if you have a very high latency and a small
TCP window, I think.
Cheers,
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-01 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-01 16:54 Nasty ext2fs bug! jpiszcz
2002-08-01 17:48 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-08-01 18:27 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2002-08-01 18:38 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2002-08-01 19:21 ` Justin Piszcz
2002-08-01 19:20 ` Justin Piszcz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020801183825.GA20265@alpha.home.local \
--to=willy@w.ods.org \
--cc=apiszcz@mitre.org \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=kernel@ragnark.vestdata.no \
--cc=lftp-devel@uniyar.ac.ru \
--cc=lftp@uniyar.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox