From: Thomas Mierau <tmi@wikon.de>
To: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.19-ac4 IRQ messup?
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 11:39:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200208061139.35323.tmi@wikon.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020806083943.GA32229@alpha.home.local>
Thanks,
I looked it up its called watchdog (what else). It was set to 5000ms and I
changed it to 300ms. But the result is : no change!
I can see the transmit and receives on the switch. The problem must be the
receive part of the transceiver.
I ran mii-diag and it reports that it is set up for full duplex 100Mbit and
has a link. So that reports back ok.
Any other ideas ?
Am Dienstag, 6. August 2002 10:39 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 10:14:30AM +0200, Thomas Mierau wrote:
> > the ping on eth0
> > The blocks of 5 return at the same time , as the time differnce is always
> > 1sec off look pretty nasty
>
> I think you get intreface resets. I had such a problem with a 3c575CB (same
> driver), connected to a defective chipset. I couldn't send high traffic
> rates, but could receive. There is a watchdog timeout that you can
> reconfigure in the 3c59x driver (I don't remember its name, use modinfo).
> If you reduce the timeout, you should see reduced drifting in the pings. I
> used 300ms I think. But IMHO, that's definitely not a timing problem.
> Perhaps in your case, it's simply a half/full duplex misconfiguration.
>
> Regards,
> Willy
>
> > PING 192.168.47.47 (192.168.47.47) from 192.168.47.11 eth0: 56(84) bytes
> > of data.
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=912 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=4912 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=3912 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=2912 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=5 ttl=255 time=1912 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=6 ttl=255 time=912 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=7 ttl=255 time=4905 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=8 ttl=255 time=3905 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=9 ttl=255 time=2905 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=10 ttl=255 time=1905 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=11 ttl=255 time=905 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=12 ttl=255 time=4912 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=13 ttl=255 time=3911 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=14 ttl=255 time=2912 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=15 ttl=255 time=1912 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=16 ttl=255 time=912 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=17 ttl=255 time=4902 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=18 ttl=255 time=3902 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=19 ttl=255 time=2902 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=20 ttl=255 time=1902 ms
> > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=21 ttl=255 time=902 ms
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-06 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-05 21:03 Heavy Clock-Drift after update from Kernel 2.4.9 to 2.4.19 Matthias Schniedermeyer
2002-08-05 22:26 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-05 22:17 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2002-08-06 8:14 ` 2.4.19-ac4 IRQ messup? Thomas Mierau
2002-08-06 8:39 ` Willy Tarreau
2002-08-06 9:39 ` Thomas Mierau [this message]
2002-08-06 10:01 ` Willy Tarreau
2002-08-06 14:44 ` Thomas Mierau
2002-08-06 16:50 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200208061139.35323.tmi@wikon.de \
--to=tmi@wikon.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@w.ods.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox