public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>,
	"Albert D. Cahalan" <acahalan@cs.uml.edu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Linux-2.5 fix/improve get_pid()
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 12:37:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020809103725.GA1017@win.tue.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1028889153.28883.186.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>

On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 11:32:33AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:

> Its much simpler to put max_pid into /proc/sys/kernel. That way we can
> boot with 32000 process ids, which will ensure ancient stuff which has
> 16bit pid_t (old old libc) and also any old kernel interfaces which
> expose it - does ipc ? 

I don't think it is a good idea to add lots of almost meaningless knobs.
This is not something one would like to adapt dynamically.
Someone who needs 16bit pid_t can compile her own kernel with a
suitable value of PID_MAX.

There is no old old libc with 16bit pid_t, I think.
I have libc 4.4.1 here with
	typedef int pid_t;
I have Linux 0.01 here with
	typedef int pid_t;

Yes, ipc exposed pid in a 16-bit field, namely in the fields
msg_lspid, msg_lrpid, shm_cpid, shm_lpid.
Two years ago I found all occurrences in all Linux sources,
but I forgot the details of the result; I do not recall
significant occurrences. Maybe someone will repeat this big grep.

Andries

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-08-09 10:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-08-08 21:43 [PATCH] Linux-2.5 fix/improve get_pid() Hubertus Franke
2002-08-08 22:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-08 22:26   ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-08 23:09     ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-08-09  3:26       ` Chris Adams
2002-08-09  7:04         ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-08-09  8:48           ` Helge Hafting
2002-08-09 10:32             ` Alan Cox
2002-08-09  9:35               ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-09 10:37               ` Andries Brouwer [this message]
2002-08-09 13:00           ` Chris Adams
2002-08-09 14:39             ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-08-09 13:59           ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-09 14:57             ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-08-08 22:34   ` Paul Larson
2002-08-08 22:44     ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-08 22:37   ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-09  1:49     ` Andries Brouwer
2002-08-09 19:34   ` Paul Larson
2002-08-09 20:13     ` Paul Larson
2002-08-09 20:40     ` Andries Brouwer
2002-08-09 21:23     ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-09 21:42       ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-09 21:46         ` Paul Larson
2002-08-09 22:04           ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-10 17:23             ` Jamie Lokier
2002-08-10 18:33               ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-10 18:48                 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-08-11 20:41                   ` Alan Cox
2002-08-11 19:58                     ` Jamie Lokier
2002-08-11 21:23                       ` Alan Cox
2002-08-11 20:10                         ` Jamie Lokier
2002-08-12  8:56             ` Padraig Brady
2002-08-12 10:37               ` Alan Cox
2002-08-12  9:21                 ` Padraig Brady
2002-08-12 14:40             ` Paul Larson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-12 16:15 Jim Houston
2002-08-09  0:53 Hubertus Franke
2002-08-08 21:50 Hubertus Franke
2002-08-08 18:56 Hubertus Franke
2002-08-08 19:15 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-08 19:18 ` Paul Larson
2002-08-07 22:03 Paul Larson
2002-08-07 23:06 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-08  0:24   ` Andries Brouwer
2002-08-08 19:42     ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-08-08 20:47       ` Andries Brouwer
2002-08-08 20:24   ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-08 21:30     ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-08-08 21:45     ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-08-09  4:42     ` William Lee Irwin III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020809103725.GA1017@win.tue.nl \
    --to=aebr@win.tue.nl \
    --cc=acahalan@cs.uml.edu \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=helgehaf@aitel.hist.no \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox