From: "Paweł Krawczyk" <kravietz@aba.krakow.pl>
To: Jamie Lokier <lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk>
Cc: zhengchuanbo <zhengcb@netpower.com.cn>,
"linux-kernel @ vger. kernel. org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: about the tuning of eepro100
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 20:02:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020810180256.GD25611@aba.krakow.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020810185558.C306@kushida.apsleyroad.org>
On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 06:55:58PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> I don't think you will get better than 90% performance, but if you do
> please let me know! I have written another e100 driver, in an attempt
> to transmit and receive small packets at the maximum possible rate.
> In tests, it would not even transmit at 100% small packets on our 82558.
> (I didn't do that test on our 82559).
Maybe we were looking for separate things - I had a firewall box with
100base-TX interfaces and when flooding it at full rate with small
(40 bytes, i.e. empty IP headers) packets the system was unusable
because of the interrupt rate. After I turned the bundling on, there
was no signs of overload. Of course, I tested throughput of the
card as well but on the IP level there was no difference I could
worry about. But as I said, this was a firewall box and I was looking
for a way to stop possible DOS, not for tiny packet delivery time
slowdown, which may be important in other applications.
--
Paweł Krawczyk, Kraków, Poland http://echelon.pl/kravietz/
crypto: http://ipsec.pl/
horses: http://kabardians.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-10 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-10 9:38 about the tuning of eepro100 zhengchuanbo
2002-08-10 9:51 ` Paweł Krawczyk
2002-08-10 10:09 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-08-10 17:55 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-08-10 18:02 ` Paweł Krawczyk [this message]
2002-08-10 18:18 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020810180256.GD25611@aba.krakow.pl \
--to=kravietz@aba.krakow.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk \
--cc=zhengcb@netpower.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox