From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 19:08:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 19:08:56 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:30724 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 19:08:55 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 00:13:01 +0100 From: Russell King To: Bernd Eckenfels Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4 and full ipv6 - will it happen? Message-ID: <20020822001301.B27506@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20020821220313.GA25141@lina.inka.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020821220313.GA25141@lina.inka.de>; from ecki@lina.inka.de on Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 12:03:13AM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 12:03:13AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 03:44:41PM -0600, Thunder from the hill wrote: > > I'm getting through with bind9 pretty well, actually. > > ip6.int? nibbles? reverse byte? ip6.arpa? A6? AAAA? There are numerous self-consistent comments by people in the know (who are even working on some of the standards) about the current direction that the above is going. If you need some URLs, ask me off list and I'll send you some of the ones that represent the current practice. -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html