Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [patch] SImple Topology API v0.3 (1/2)

Timothy D. Witham
2002-08-28T22:42:01Z

I don't think that it really matters the only thing
that I was thinking of is that you might have
a case in the future where you would like to break out
some of the stuff into say ... PPC or SPARC NUMA and also
X86 NUMA but still keep the Cache Coherent NUMA configuration
as a base. But that is just wild talk from somebody
who knows wild talk. :-)

Tim

On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 15:40, Thunder from the hill wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28 Aug 2002, Timothy D. Witham wrote:
> > How about the old Marketing name CONFIG_CCNUMA?
>
> Why not keep CONFIG_X86_NUMA then?
>
> Thunder
> --
> --./../...-/. -.--/---/..-/.-./..././.-../..-. .---/..-/.../- .-
> --/../-./..-/-/./--..-- ../.----./.-../.-.. --./../...-/. -.--/---/..-
> .- -/---/--/---/.-./.-./---/.--/.-.-.-
> --./.-/-.../.-./.././.-../.-.-.-
--
Timothy D. Witham - Lab Director - wookie@osdlab.org
Open Source Development Lab Inc - A non-profit corporation
15275 SW Koll Parkway - Suite H - Beaverton OR, 97006
(503)-626-2455 x11 (office) (503)-702-2871 (cell)
(503)-626-2436 (fax)