* 2.4.19 and binutils 2.13.90.0.3 dont compile
@ 2002-08-31 18:38 Michael Obster
2002-08-31 19:41 ` Alessandro Suardi
2002-09-01 3:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michael Obster @ 2002-08-31 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 625 bytes --]
Hi,
can you have a look on that. Seems for me to be a problem with the new
binutils version, because with binutils 2.12.90.0.4 the kernel compiles.
Is there a workaround present?
Kind Regards,
Michael Obster
---
Do you want to rock? ___ ___ ___ _ _
http://www.rocklinux.org/ | _ || _ || __|| |//
||_|||| |||| | /
| _|||_||||__ | \
||\\ |_LINUX__||_|\\
------------------------------------------------------------------
[-- Attachment #2: kernel --]
[-- Type: application/x-java-vm, Size: 5729 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.19 and binutils 2.13.90.0.3 dont compile
2002-08-31 18:38 2.4.19 and binutils 2.13.90.0.3 dont compile Michael Obster
@ 2002-08-31 19:41 ` Alessandro Suardi
2002-08-31 19:45 ` Alessandro Suardi
2002-09-01 3:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alessandro Suardi @ 2002-08-31 19:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Obster; +Cc: linux-kernel
Michael Obster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can you have a look on that. Seems for me to be a problem with the new
> binutils version, because with binutils 2.12.90.0.4 the kernel compiles.
> Is there a workaround present?
The best thing you can do is to post the actual error you get...
Anyway, 2.4.20-pre5 is happily built by binutils 2.13.90.0.4
and gcc-3.2.
--alessandro
"everything dies, baby that's a fact
but maybe everything that dies someday comes back"
(Bruce Springsteen, "Atlantic City")
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.19 and binutils 2.13.90.0.3 dont compile
2002-08-31 19:41 ` Alessandro Suardi
@ 2002-08-31 19:45 ` Alessandro Suardi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alessandro Suardi @ 2002-08-31 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Obster; +Cc: linux-kernel
Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> Michael Obster wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> can you have a look on that. Seems for me to be a problem with the new
>> binutils version, because with binutils 2.12.90.0.4 the kernel
>> compiles. Is there a workaround present?
>
>
> The best thing you can do is to post the actual error you get...
Argh - sorry, I didn't notice the attachment :/
> Anyway, 2.4.20-pre5 is happily built by binutils 2.13.90.0.4
> and gcc-3.2.
Perhaps gcc-2.95.3 and newest binutils don't get along; have
you already tried the very latest binutils ?
--alessandro
"everything dies, baby that's a fact
but maybe everything that dies someday comes back"
(Bruce Springsteen, "Atlantic City")
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.19 and binutils 2.13.90.0.3 dont compile
2002-08-31 18:38 2.4.19 and binutils 2.13.90.0.3 dont compile Michael Obster
2002-08-31 19:41 ` Alessandro Suardi
@ 2002-09-01 3:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-01 11:41 ` Michael Obster
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-09-01 3:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Obster; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 08:38:25PM +0200, Michael Obster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can you have a look on that. Seems for me to be a problem with the new
> binutils version, because with binutils 2.12.90.0.4 the kernel compiles.
> Is there a workaround present?
The attached was a GCC error, the assembler is not even involved. You
may want to check your GCC installations some more.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.19 and binutils 2.13.90.0.3 dont compile
2002-09-01 3:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2002-09-01 11:41 ` Michael Obster
2002-09-01 14:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michael Obster @ 2002-09-01 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hi,
>
> The attached was a GCC error, the assembler is not even involved. You
> may want to check your GCC installations some more.
>
i dont see any error on the gcc installation. it must be a library or
could it be a buggy version of bin86. Have 0.16.8 installed.
Kind Regards,
Michael Obster
---
Do you want to rock? ___ ___ ___ _ _
http://www.rocklinux.org/ | _ || _ || __|| |//
||_|||| |||| | /
| _|||_||||__ | \
||\\ |_LINUX__||_|\\
------------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.19 and binutils 2.13.90.0.3 dont compile
2002-09-01 11:41 ` Michael Obster
@ 2002-09-01 14:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-09-01 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Obster; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 01:41:31PM +0200, Michael Obster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >
> >The attached was a GCC error, the assembler is not even involved. You
> >may want to check your GCC installations some more.
> >
> i dont see any error on the gcc installation. it must be a library or
> could it be a buggy version of bin86. Have 0.16.8 installed.
No, it is definitely an error deliver by GCC based on source code, so
it is a GCC problem.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-09-01 14:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-08-31 18:38 2.4.19 and binutils 2.13.90.0.3 dont compile Michael Obster
2002-08-31 19:41 ` Alessandro Suardi
2002-08-31 19:45 ` Alessandro Suardi
2002-09-01 3:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-01 11:41 ` Michael Obster
2002-09-01 14:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).