public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Lehmann <aaronl@vitelus.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: ext3 throughput woes on certain (possibly heavily fragmented) files
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 02:24:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020903092419.GA5643@vitelus.com> (raw)

This pretty much sums it up:

[aaronl@vitelus:~]$ time cat mail/debian-legal > /dev/null
cat mail/debian-legal > /dev/null  0.00s user 0.02s system 0% cpu 5.565 total
[aaronl@vitelus:~]$ ls -l mail/debian-legal
-rw-------    1 aaronl   mail      7893525 Sep  3 00:42 mail/debian-legal
[aaronl@vitelus:~]$ time cat /usr/src/linux-2.4.18.tar.bz2 > /dev/null
cat /usr/src/linux-2.4.18.tar.bz2 > /dev/null  0.00s user 0.10s system 16% cpu 0.616 total
[aaronl@vitelus:~]$ ls -l /usr/src/linux-2.4.18.tar.bz2 
-rw-r--r--    1 aaronl   aaronl   24161675 Apr 14 11:53

Both files were AFAIK not in any cache, and they are on the same
partition.

My current uninformed theory is that this is caused by fragmentation,
since the linux tarball was downloaded all at once but the mailbox I'm
comparing it to has 1695 messages, each of which having been appended
seperately to the file. All of my mailboxes exhibit similarly awful
performance.

Do any other filesystems handle this type of thing more gracefully? Is
there room for improvement in ext3? Is there any way I can test my
theory by seeing how fragmented a certain inode is? What can I do to
avoid extensive fragmentation, if it is truely the cause of my issue?

I'm running 2.4.20-pre5, but this is not a recently-introduced problem.

The disk is IDE - nothing fancy, WDC WD200BB-18CAA0. IDE controller is
ServerWorks CSB5. However, I've had this problem consistantly on
previous hardware.

             reply	other threads:[~2002-09-03  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-03  9:24 Aaron Lehmann [this message]
2002-09-06 16:06 ` ext3 throughput woes on certain (possibly heavily fragmented) files Stephen C. Tweedie
2002-09-06 17:14   ` Nikita Danilov
2002-09-06 17:22     ` Hans Reiser
2002-09-06 21:02       ` Aaron Lehmann
2002-09-06 22:05         ` Hans Reiser
2002-09-06 17:24     ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2002-09-16 22:39       ` Simon Kirby
2002-09-17 16:53         ` Andreas Dilger
2002-09-17 21:55         ` jw schultz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-16 18:00 Peter Niemayer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020903092419.GA5643@vitelus.com \
    --to=aaronl@vitelus.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox