public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@elf.ucw.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org
Subject: Re: aio-core in 2.5 - io_queue_wait and io_getevents
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 17:34:00 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020903173400.A2857@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020902184043.GN1210@dualathlon.random>; from andrea@suse.de on Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:40:43PM +0200

Changed the title to reflect the latest discussion. Just wanted
to comment on the nwait bit.

On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:40:43PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> 
> then about the 2.5 API we have such min_nr that allows the "at least
> min_nr", instead of the previous default of "at least 1", so that it
> allows implementing the aio_nwait of aix.

Partly, in the sense that the implementation still doesn't avoid 
extra wakeups when less than min_nr events are available at a time 
(if we are unlucky enough to have the min_nr events dripping in 
slowly one at a time, we'd still have all those context switches, 
won't we ?), though it saves on the extra user-kernel transitions 
on those wakeups compared to if this were implemented in user-space 
over an at-least-one primitive. 

It is possible to play around with the implementation later though.
The important bit is having "at least N" in the interface exported 
by the kernel, which is good.

Regards
Suparna

> Andrea

  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-03 12:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-30  5:41 async-io API registration for 2.5.29 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-07-30  8:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-07-30 13:40   ` Linus Torvalds
2002-07-30 13:52     ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-07-30 16:43   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-07-30 16:59     ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-07-30 19:10       ` Jeff Dike
2002-07-30 18:09         ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-07-30 18:15           ` Linus Torvalds
2002-07-30 18:31             ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-07-30 20:57               ` Jeff Dike
2002-07-30 20:47           ` Jeff Dike
2002-07-30 21:26       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-07-30 10:50 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-30 12:49 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-07-30 13:29   ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2002-07-30 21:41   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-07-30 21:54     ` [rfc] aio-core for 2.5.29 (Re: async-io API registration for 2.5.29) Benjamin LaHaise
2002-07-31  0:44       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-07-31 14:46         ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-07-31 16:31         ` Charles 'Buck' Krasic
2002-08-01 10:30         ` Pavel Machek
2002-08-01 14:47           ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-08-01 15:00             ` Chris Friesen
2002-08-01 16:09               ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-01 17:30                 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-01 16:30                   ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-01 16:41                     ` [rfc] aio-core for 2.5.29 (Re: async-io API registration for2.5.29) Chris Friesen
2002-08-01 18:01                     ` [rfc] aio-core for 2.5.29 (Re: async-io API registration for 2.5.29) Benjamin LaHaise
2002-08-15 23:54                       ` aio-core why not using SuS? [Re: [rfc] aio-core for 2.5.29 (Re: async-io API registration for 2.5.29)] Andrea Arcangeli
2002-08-16  1:42                         ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-08-16  1:57                           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-08-16  2:00                             ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-08-16  2:08                               ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-16  2:16                                 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-08-16  2:40                                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-08-16  3:43                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-16  3:50                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-16  4:47                                       ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-08-17  3:46                                   ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-17  4:00                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-17  4:15                                       ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-17  4:46                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2001-11-02  5:12                                           ` Pavel Machek
2002-08-17  5:04                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-17  5:24                                             ` lots of mem on 32 bit machines (was: aio-core why not using SuS?) Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-17  5:12                                           ` aio-core why not using SuS? [Re: [rfc] aio-core for 2.5.29 (Re: async-io API registration for 2.5.29)] Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-17 17:02                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-17 21:27                                               ` 32 bit arch with lots of RAM Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-22 16:30                                                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-08-22 16:36                                                   ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-22 16:15                                               ` aio-core why not using SuS? [Re: [rfc] aio-core for 2.5.29 (Re: async-io API registration for 2.5.29)] Andrea Arcangeli
2002-08-22 16:12                                             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-08-20  0:35                                           ` Ingo Molnar
2002-08-17  4:36                                       ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-08-16  2:32                                 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-16  2:32                               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-08-16  9:39                           ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2002-08-16 10:03                             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-08-16 11:23                               ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2002-08-16 11:28                                 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2002-08-16 13:49                                   ` Dan Kegel
2002-09-02 18:40                                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-09-03 12:04                                   ` Suparna Bhattacharya [this message]
2002-09-05  5:21                                   ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-08-16 13:43                             ` Dan Kegel
2002-08-16 14:21                               ` Jamie Lokier
2002-08-16 14:42                                 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-08-16 15:40                               ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-08-23 16:11                                 ` aio-core why not using SuS? [Re: [rfc] aio-core for 2.5.29 (Re:async-io " Dan Kegel
2002-08-16  1:53                         ` aio-core why not using SuS? [Re: [rfc] aio-core for 2.5.29 (Re: async-io " Dan Kegel
2002-08-01 19:18                     ` [rfc] aio-core for 2.5.29 (Re: async-io API registration for 2.5.29) Chris Wedgwood
2002-08-01 19:25                       ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-01 19:31                         ` Chris Wedgwood
2002-08-02  8:24                     ` Pavel Machek
2002-08-02 11:59                       ` Alan Cox
2002-08-02 15:56                         ` Linus Torvalds
2002-07-31  1:20     ` async-io API registration for 2.5.29 Rik van Riel
2002-07-31  1:32       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-07-31  8:25         ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-07-31 13:19           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-07-30 13:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-07-30 16:49   ` Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020903173400.A2857@in.ibm.com \
    --to=suparna@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
    --cc=cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@elf.ucw.cz \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox