public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: aic7xxx sets CDR offline, how to reset?
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 11:13:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200209041613.g84GDtv02639@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Message from Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>  of "Tue, 03 Sep 2002 18:50:36 EDT." <20020903185036.G12201@redhat.com>

dledford@redhat.com said:
> Now, granted, that is more complex than going straight to a BDR, but I
>  have to argue that it *isn't* that complex.  It certainly isn't the
> nightmare you make it sound like ;-) 

It's three times longer even in pseudocode...

However, assume we do this (because we must for barrier preservation).  The 
chances are that for a failing device we're aborting a significant number of 
the tags.  This is quite a big increase in the message load over what we do 
now---Particularly for the AIC driver which can have hundreds of tags 
outstanding (murphys law says it's usually the earilest tag which times out).  
I'm not convinced that a BDR, which is a single message and has roughly the 
same effect, isn't preferable.

However, what about a compromise?  We can count outstanding commands, so what 
about doing abort *if* the number of outstanding commands is exactly one (the 
one we're trying to abort).  This means for devices that don't do TCQ (like 
old CD-ROMs) we'll always try abort first.  For large numbers of outstanding 
tags, we skip over abort and move straight to BDR.  The code to implement this 
will be clean and simple because abort no longer has to pay attention to the 
barrier.

James



  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-09-04 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-03 14:35 aic7xxx sets CDR offline, how to reset? James Bottomley
2002-09-03 18:23 ` Doug Ledford
2002-09-03 19:09   ` James Bottomley
2002-09-03 20:59     ` Alan Cox
2002-09-03 21:32       ` James Bottomley
2002-09-03 21:54         ` Alan Cox
2002-09-03 22:50         ` Doug Ledford
2002-09-03 23:28           ` Alan Cox
2002-09-04  7:40           ` Jeremy Higdon
2002-09-04 16:24             ` James Bottomley
2002-09-04 17:13               ` Mike Anderson
2002-09-05  9:50               ` Jeremy Higdon
2002-09-04 16:13           ` James Bottomley [this message]
2002-09-04 16:50             ` Justin T. Gibbs
2002-09-05  9:39               ` Jeremy Higdon
2002-09-05 13:35                 ` Justin T. Gibbs
2002-09-03 21:13     ` Doug Ledford
2002-09-03 21:48       ` James Bottomley
2002-09-03 22:42         ` Doug Ledford
2002-09-03 22:52           ` Doug Ledford
2002-09-03 23:29           ` Alan Cox
2002-09-04 21:16           ` Luben Tuikov
2002-09-04 10:37         ` Andries Brouwer
2002-09-04 10:48           ` Doug Ledford
2002-09-04 11:23           ` Alan Cox
2002-09-04 16:25             ` Rogier Wolff
2002-09-04 19:34               ` Thunder from the hill
2002-09-03 21:24     ` Patrick Mansfield
2002-09-03 22:02       ` James Bottomley
2002-09-03 23:26         ` Alan Cox
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-02 12:23 CAMTP guest
2002-09-02 15:50 ` Justin T. Gibbs
2002-09-02 18:05   ` Doug Ledford
2002-09-02 19:16     ` CAMTP guest
2002-09-02 19:48       ` Justin T. Gibbs
2002-09-02 19:42     ` Justin T. Gibbs
2002-06-11  2:46 Proposed changes to generic blk tag for use in SCSI (1/3) James Bottomley
2002-06-11  5:50 ` Jens Axboe
2002-06-11 14:29   ` James Bottomley
2002-06-11 14:45     ` Jens Axboe
2002-06-11 16:39       ` James Bottomley
2002-06-13 21:01 ` Doug Ledford
2002-06-13 21:26   ` James Bottomley
2002-06-13 21:50     ` Doug Ledford
2002-06-13 22:09       ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200209041613.g84GDtv02639@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=gibbs@scsiguy.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox