From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] ptrace-fix-2.5.33-A1
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 19:02:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020905230250.GC14295@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209060029200.16108-100000@localhost.localdomain>
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:35:22AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> there are two kinds of wait4 calls, one that gets the WIFSTOPPED event
> from the debugged task, for this the traced task has to be in the
> debugger's ->children list.
>
> Another one is when a debugged task exits and its parent wants the exit
> event. But in this case the task is untraced already, so it gets back into
> the parent's ->children list.
>
> ie. wait4 should only look at the ->children list - zombies (or traced
> tasks debugged by this task) can only be there.
>
> The only addition is that in the wait4 non-blocking case we need to look
> at the traced list as well - since a non-blocking wait4 is a 'could there
> be any children exiting' kind of query.
OK. I think that the !list_empty (ptrace_children) isn't really enough
- since there can be things on our children list that we will not wait
for - should we be iterating over it making the same checks we do
above?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-05 22:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-05 22:09 [patch] ptrace-fix-2.5.33-A1 Ingo Molnar
2002-09-05 22:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-05 22:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-05 22:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-05 22:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-05 22:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-05 22:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-06 15:27 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2002-09-06 15:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-06 15:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-06 20:44 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2002-09-05 22:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-05 22:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-05 22:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-05 23:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2002-09-05 23:08 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-05 22:10 Ingo Molnar
2002-09-05 15:35 Ingo Molnar
2002-09-05 17:08 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2002-09-05 18:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-05 20:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-05 21:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-05 22:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020905230250.GC14295@nevyn.them.org \
--to=dan@debian.org \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox