From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 03:40:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 03:40:05 -0400 Received: from 205-158-62-105.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.105]:15774 "HELO ws4-4.us4.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 03:40:05 -0400 Message-ID: <20020906074438.26142.qmail@linuxmail.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.41 (Entity 5.404) From: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" To: , Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 15:44:38 +0800 Subject: Re: side-by-side Re: BYTE Unix Benchmarks Version 3.6 X-Originating-Ip: 194.185.48.246 X-Originating-Server: ws4-4.us4.outblaze.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Daniel Phillips [...] > What kind of arithmetic is this? Why on earth would arithmetic vary > from one kernel to another? Yep, you are right! There is something wrong in that test. Look at my new tests I've just post using Unix Benchmarks Version 4.1, they more intersting. Ciao, Paolo -- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org Powered by Outblaze