From: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>
To: "Peter T. Breuer" <ptb@it.uc3m.es>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: (fwd) Re: [RFC] mount flag "direct"
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 11:50:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020906095058.GC8771@marowsky-bree.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200209060917.g869H5c08220@oboe.it.uc3m.es>
On 2002-09-06T11:17:05,
"Peter T. Breuer" <ptb@it.uc3m.es> said:
Peter, you seem to be ignoring the long-ish mail I sent to you and l-k on Wed,
4 Sep 2002 11:26:45 +0200, trying to figure out why you are trying what you
are saying. Could you please enlighten us?
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>
--
Immortality is an adequate definition of high availability for me.
--- Gregory F. Pfister
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-06 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-03 21:48 (fwd) Re: [RFC] mount flag "direct" Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-03 22:19 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-03 22:42 ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-03 22:52 ` Xavier Bestel
2002-09-03 23:44 ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-04 7:06 ` Alexander Viro
2002-09-04 9:02 ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-04 11:05 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-04 11:39 ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-04 14:13 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-05 22:45 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-05 23:06 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-05 23:17 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-05 23:24 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-06 8:57 ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-06 9:08 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-06 9:17 ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-06 9:50 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree [this message]
2002-09-06 14:10 ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-06 13:20 ` Helge Hafting
2002-09-06 13:22 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-06 13:53 ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-06 15:32 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-06 14:25 ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-06 17:20 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-06 17:33 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-06 19:32 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-06 18:29 ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-06 19:30 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-09 16:30 ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-17 11:21 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-05 8:30 ` Helge Hafting
2002-09-05 8:43 ` David Lang
2002-09-05 14:24 ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-05 16:59 ` David Lang
2002-09-05 23:08 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-06 8:14 ` Ingo Oeser
2002-09-06 9:06 ` Helge Hafting
2002-09-04 12:49 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2002-09-04 12:54 ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-04 13:22 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2002-09-05 3:36 ` Edgar Toernig
2002-09-05 3:58 ` Alexander Viro
2002-09-05 15:59 ` [RFC] intent-based lookup (was: mount flag "direct") Andreas Dilger
2002-09-03 23:24 ` (fwd) Re: [RFC] mount flag "direct" David Lang
2002-09-04 4:27 ` Kevin O'Connor
2002-09-03 23:05 ` David Lang
[not found] <02Sep6.161154edt.62237@gpu.utcc.utoronto.ca>
2002-09-07 13:36 ` Peter T. Breuer
[not found] <20020909181724.GA31153@ravel.coda.cs.cmu.edu>
2002-09-09 18:58 ` Peter T. Breuer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020906095058.GC8771@marowsky-bree.de \
--to=lmb@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ptb@it.uc3m.es \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox