From: Shawn <core@enodev.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Shawn <core@enodev.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Thunder from the hill <thunder@lightweight.ods.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: XFS?
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:55:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020911095529.A8346@q.mn.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020911065208.00b32b00@pop.gmx.net>; from efault@gmx.de on Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 06:56:22AM +0200
Which is why I pointed out that the issue at hand was not regarding the
everything else, but in fact the actual filesystem support.
As far as why the rest is still pending, I was just offering ideas.
A lot of this thread is advocacy as opposed to substantive conversation
about the how and/or why/why not of inclusion of XFS into mainline.
Fankly, there is no /real/ answer except "Linus has not weighed in on
the current question".
I lost my ability to invest emotions in either side of huge kernel
debates when the devfs and lvm wars happened.
On 09/10, Mike Galbraith said something like:
> At 02:23 PM 9/10/2002 -0500, Shawn wrote:
> >I'm not sure what this is intended to communicate.
>
> (sigh)
> If "everything else" the XFS team has asked for has gone in, it seems
> unlikely that
> sponsorship is needed.
>
> -Mike
--
Shawn Leas
core@enodev.com
I went to the eye doctor and found out I needed glasses for reading. So,
I got some flip-up contact lenses.
-- Stephen Wright
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-11 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20020909193820.GA2007@lnuxlab.ath.cx.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209091457590.3793-100000@hawkeye.luckynet.adm.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-09-09 21:12 ` XFS? Andi Kleen
2002-09-09 21:20 ` XFS? Shawn
2002-09-09 21:27 ` XFS? Robert Love
2002-09-10 17:15 ` XFS? Mike Galbraith
2002-09-10 19:23 ` XFS? Shawn
2002-09-10 19:29 ` XFS? Robert Love
2002-09-10 19:33 ` XFS? Thunder from the hill
2002-09-11 0:33 ` XFS? Bryan Whitehead
2002-09-10 20:06 ` XFS? John Alvord
2002-09-10 20:17 ` XFS? Hans Reiser
2002-09-10 20:17 ` XFS? Joe Kellner
2002-09-10 20:26 ` XFS? David Lang
2002-09-10 20:31 ` XFS? Tomas Szepe
2002-09-11 2:34 ` XFS? Bernd Eckenfels
2002-09-10 22:18 ` XFS? Nick LeRoy
2002-09-10 20:34 ` XFS? Tomas Szepe
2002-09-10 21:01 ` XFS? Steve Lord
2002-09-11 8:43 ` XFS? jw schultz
2002-09-11 15:20 ` XFS? Nick LeRoy
2002-09-11 17:08 ` XFS? Hans Reiser
2002-09-11 17:13 ` [OT] XFS? Joe Kellner
2002-09-11 17:18 ` Hans Reiser
2002-09-11 19:51 ` Remco Post
2002-09-11 18:24 ` XFS? Gerhard Mack
2002-09-11 18:54 ` XFS? Lorenzo Allegrucci
2002-09-12 18:25 ` XFS? Bryan Whitehead
2002-09-12 18:33 ` XFS? Nikita Danilov
2002-09-13 11:44 ` XFS? Bill Davidsen
2002-09-13 12:44 ` XFS? Hans Reiser
2002-09-13 15:47 ` XFS? Bill Davidsen
2002-09-12 23:38 ` XFS? Samuel Flory
2002-09-11 21:21 ` XFS? jw schultz
2002-09-11 22:41 ` XFS? Nick LeRoy
2002-09-11 23:01 ` XFS? Robert Varga
2002-09-12 2:48 ` XFS? jw schultz
2002-09-11 4:56 ` XFS? Mike Galbraith
2002-09-11 14:55 ` Shawn [this message]
2002-09-11 17:52 ` XFS? Mike Galbraith
2002-09-11 15:12 ` XFS? Bill Davidsen
2002-09-11 16:03 ` XFS? Alan Cox
2002-09-11 18:55 ` XFS? Eric Sandeen
2002-09-11 21:37 ` XFS? Alan Cox
2002-09-13 10:52 XFS? Kostadin Karaivanov
2002-09-13 10:57 ` XFS? Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-13 7:47 XFS? Ivan Ivanov
2002-09-13 9:32 ` XFS? Nero
2002-09-13 10:22 ` XFS? Ivan Ivanov
2002-09-13 11:07 ` XFS? Filip Van Raemdonck
2002-09-13 12:42 ` XFS? Hans Reiser
2002-09-13 9:53 ` XFS? Remco Post
2002-09-13 11:38 ` XFS? Hans Reiser
2002-09-13 12:47 ` XFS? Jesse Pollard
2002-09-13 13:33 ` XFS? Ian S. Nelson
[not found] <3D80CCEF.7070007@tmsusa.com>
2002-09-12 17:53 ` XFS? jbradford
[not found] <200209121553.g8CFrrEh003646@dstl.gov.uk>
2002-09-12 16:03 ` XFS? Tony Gale
2002-09-13 5:58 ` XFS? Tomas Szepe
2002-09-12 15:27 XFS? Martin Knoblauch
2002-09-12 15:53 ` XFS? jbradford
2002-09-12 17:06 ` XFS? Thunder from the hill
2002-09-12 17:28 ` XFS? Joe Kellner
2002-09-12 17:44 ` XFS? Thunder from the hill
2002-09-12 17:54 ` XFS? Joe Kellner
2002-09-12 17:09 ` XFS? Bernd Petrovitsch
2002-09-12 17:45 ` XFS? Thunder from the hill
2002-09-12 13:54 XFS? Martin Knoblauch
2002-09-12 13:42 XFS? Martin Knoblauch
2002-09-12 15:00 ` XFS? jbradford
2002-09-13 11:53 ` XFS? Bill Davidsen
2002-09-13 12:27 ` XFS? jbradford
2002-09-13 13:21 ` XFS? jlnance
[not found] <1059487013@toto.iv>
2002-09-11 0:31 ` XFS? Peter Chubb
2002-09-09 19:38 XFS? khromy
[not found] ` <3D7CFEE5.3030600@netscape.net>
2002-09-09 20:08 ` XFS? Wade
2002-09-09 20:16 ` XFS? Tomas Szepe
2002-09-09 20:43 ` XFS? Arador
2002-09-09 21:18 ` XFS? Shawn
2002-09-09 22:31 ` XFS? Rik van Riel
2002-09-10 6:23 ` XFS? Wade
2002-09-10 13:24 ` XFS? Gerhard Mack
2002-09-09 21:00 ` XFS? Thunder from the hill
2002-09-09 22:29 ` XFS? Joe Kellner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020911095529.A8346@q.mn.rr.com \
--to=core@enodev.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thunder@lightweight.ods.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox