From: Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>, Thomas Molina <tmolina@cox.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.5 Problem Status Report
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:28:08 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020911112808.A6341@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209110915140.5546-100000@localhost.localdomain>
Hello!
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 09:26:40AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > BUG at kernel/sched.c open 10 Sep 2002
> > > What exactly is this?
> > Looks like this is my bugreport for BUG in kernel/sched.c:944 in the middle
> > of partition parsing output on boot.
> > Subject of email was
> > '2.5.34 BUG at kernel/sched.c:944 (partitions code related?)'
> > msgid: 20020910175639.A830@namesys.com
> very strange backtrace:
> >>EIP; c0115818 <schedule+18/4a0> <=====
> Trace; c01053a0 <default_idle+0/40>
I noticed it too.
> i've once seen the 2.5 IDE code doing a schedule_timeout() from an IRQ
> handler, but the above has to be something else. Could you hack sched.c to
> print out the exact preemption count? It could be a preempt-count
> underflow due to an unbalanced spin_unlock, or an inbalanced
> preempt_enable. [or the IRQ code - but i doubt that, we'd have seen
I have preemption disabled.
> problems much earlier if this was the case.]
> Oleg, do you have CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK enabled? That should catch an
> unbalanced spin_unlock().
Yes, I do.
CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=y
CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM=y
Bye,
Oleg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-11 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-11 2:00 2.5 Problem Status Report Thomas Molina
2002-09-11 2:29 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-11 18:33 ` Thomas Molina
2002-09-11 20:23 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-11 4:00 ` Robert Love
2002-09-11 7:07 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-09-11 7:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-11 7:28 ` Oleg Drokin [this message]
2002-09-11 7:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-11 8:05 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-09-11 10:25 ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-11 10:29 ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-11 10:47 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-09-11 10:58 ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-11 11:07 ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-11 11:16 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-09-11 11:17 ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-11 11:49 ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-11 12:10 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-09-11 15:38 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-09-11 15:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-11 15:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-11 17:49 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-09-11 8:07 ` Thomas Molina
2002-09-11 8:12 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-09-11 9:18 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-09-11 7:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-11 8:04 ` Axel Siebenwirth
2002-09-11 9:21 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-25 11:21 Thomas Molina
2002-08-26 16:42 ` Greg KH
2002-08-26 21:32 ` Thomas Molina
2002-08-02 2:39 2.5 Problem Status report Thomas Molina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020911112808.A6341@namesys.com \
--to=green@namesys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=tmolina@cox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox