From: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
"Hanumanthu. H" <hanumanthu.hanok@wipro.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pid_max hang again...
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:21:06 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020912152106.B31236@hq.fsmlabs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0209121817130.1857-100000@imladris.surriel.com>; from riel@conectiva.com.br on Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 06:17:26PM -0300
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 06:17:26PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Andries Brouwer wrote:
>
> > Once people stand up and say that they need Linux machines with 10^6
> > processes, or with 10^4 processes and real time guarantees, then we
> > must have a discussion about data structures, and a discussion about
> > standards.
>
> IIRC that happened last month.
And what about a discussion about reality?
--
---------------------------------------------------------
Victor Yodaiken
Finite State Machine Labs: The RTLinux Company.
www.fsmlabs.com www.rtlinux.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-12 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-11 8:59 [PATCH] pid_max hang again Hanumanthu. H
2002-09-11 17:19 ` Andries Brouwer
2002-09-11 20:23 ` jw schultz
2002-09-12 1:11 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-12 1:54 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-12 20:23 ` Andries Brouwer
2002-09-12 21:17 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-12 21:21 ` yodaiken [this message]
2002-09-13 5:47 ` Hanumanthu. H
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-07 9:06 Manfred Spraul
2002-09-09 14:22 ` Hanumanthu. H
2002-09-09 15:07 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-09 22:39 ` jw schultz
2002-09-10 9:54 ` Andries Brouwer
2002-09-10 19:29 ` jw schultz
2002-09-07 8:16 Hanumanthu. H
2002-09-06 21:06 Manfred Spraul
2002-09-06 15:39 Ingo Molnar
2002-09-06 17:43 ` [PATCH] " Paul Larson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020912152106.B31236@hq.fsmlabs.com \
--to=yodaiken@fsmlabs.com \
--cc=aebr@win.tue.nl \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=hanumanthu.hanok@wipro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox