From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
To: Simon Kirby <sim@netnation.com>
Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext3 throughput woes on certain (possibly heavily fragmented) files
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 10:53:00 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020917165300.GB11665@clusterfs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020916223911.GA1658@netnation.com>
On Sep 16, 2002 15:39 -0700, Simon Kirby wrote:
> We recently switched a large mail spool from ext2 to ext3 with default
> journalling, and we are now having huge problems with disk I/O load.
>
> We have fsync and friends disabled for performance reasons. With ext2,
> the machine would happily hum along with an average load of 0.2 and a
> usual 400 kB - 800 kB write every 5 seconds, with about 10 kB/sec read in
> every second.
>
> This box is primarily running a POP3 server (written in-house to cache
> mbox offsets, so that it can handle a huge volume of mail), and also
> exports the mail spool via NFS to other servers which run exim (-fsync).
> nfsd is exported async. Everything is mounted noatime, nodiratime. No
> applications should be calling sync/fsync/fdatasync or using O_SYNC.
> It's a mail server, so everything is fragmented.
Hmm, it seems strange (and rather unsafe) that you would run a mail
spool without using sync I/O. Unfortunate too, because sync I/O with
a large journal (and perhaps an external journal disk) would give you
very fast throughput on ext3.
> We're using dotlocking. Would this cause metadata journalling?
> I estimate about 200 - 300 dotlock files are created per second, but
> these should all be asynchronous.
Lots of it. So, that is 250 * (1 dir block + 1 inode bitmap + 1 inode
table block (+ 1 block bitmap + 1 data block, if there is data in the
dotlock file)) = 1250 blocks/second or so.
> Would switching to fctnl() locking (if this works over NFS) solve the
> problem?
Probably (no disk I/O generated), but I don't know the state of NFS locking.
> We had to hash the mail spool a long time ago do to system time eating all
> CPU (the ext2 linear directory scan to find a slot available in the spool
> directory to add the dotlock file).
One reason why we are adding hash-indexed directory support to ext3, so
that you don't have to implement it in each application.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-17 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-03 9:24 ext3 throughput woes on certain (possibly heavily fragmented) files Aaron Lehmann
2002-09-06 16:06 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2002-09-06 17:14 ` Nikita Danilov
2002-09-06 17:22 ` Hans Reiser
2002-09-06 21:02 ` Aaron Lehmann
2002-09-06 22:05 ` Hans Reiser
2002-09-06 17:24 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2002-09-16 22:39 ` Simon Kirby
2002-09-17 16:53 ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2002-09-17 21:55 ` jw schultz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-16 18:00 Peter Niemayer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020917165300.GB11665@clusterfs.com \
--to=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=sim@netnation.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox