public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cantab.net>,
	Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ide double init? + Re: BUG: Current 2.5-BK tree dies on boot!
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:14:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020919111422.GD31033@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1032433110.26669.30.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>

On Thu, Sep 19 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 11:08, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Seems to be ide probe calling the pci probe functions, and then they get
> > called by the pci layer later when they register. Dunno what the best
> > way to handle this is. Alan quotes ordering constraints as the reason.
> > Then maybe the easiest fix is to just do
> 
> Something is very wrong if they initialize twice. Hacking chipset_init
> is not a fix its an ugly hack.

True :-)

> They should end up on the ide queue to init, then transfer to the core
> PCI hotplug layer. The hotplug layer won't call the setups again because
> the device is already owned by the driver that grabbed it.
> 
> In 2.4 at least pci_register_driver checks that it doesnt do that
> 
>     pci_for_each_dev(dev) {
>                 if (!pci_dev_driver(dev))
>                         count += pci_announce_device(drv, dev);
>         }
> 
> 
> 2.5 should do the same

2.5 is reorged big time it seems, pci_register_driver() ->
drier_attach() -> do_driver_attach() -> found_match() calls ->probe()
unconditionally...

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-19 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-18 20:44 BUG: Current 2.5-BK tree dies on boot! Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-18 22:58 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-09-19  8:47 ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-19  9:33   ` ide double init? + " Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-19  9:45     ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-19 10:08       ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-19 10:58         ` Alan Cox
2002-09-19 11:14           ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2002-09-19 13:28             ` Alan Cox
2002-09-19 13:27               ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-19 17:48                 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-09-19 18:02                   ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020919111422.GD31033@suse.de \
    --to=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=aia21@cantab.net \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=andre@linux-ide.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox