From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cantab.net>,
Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ide double init? + Re: BUG: Current 2.5-BK tree dies on boot!
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:14:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020919111422.GD31033@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1032433110.26669.30.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>
On Thu, Sep 19 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 11:08, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Seems to be ide probe calling the pci probe functions, and then they get
> > called by the pci layer later when they register. Dunno what the best
> > way to handle this is. Alan quotes ordering constraints as the reason.
> > Then maybe the easiest fix is to just do
>
> Something is very wrong if they initialize twice. Hacking chipset_init
> is not a fix its an ugly hack.
True :-)
> They should end up on the ide queue to init, then transfer to the core
> PCI hotplug layer. The hotplug layer won't call the setups again because
> the device is already owned by the driver that grabbed it.
>
> In 2.4 at least pci_register_driver checks that it doesnt do that
>
> pci_for_each_dev(dev) {
> if (!pci_dev_driver(dev))
> count += pci_announce_device(drv, dev);
> }
>
>
> 2.5 should do the same
2.5 is reorged big time it seems, pci_register_driver() ->
drier_attach() -> do_driver_attach() -> found_match() calls ->probe()
unconditionally...
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-19 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-18 20:44 BUG: Current 2.5-BK tree dies on boot! Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-18 22:58 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-09-19 8:47 ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-19 9:33 ` ide double init? + " Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-19 9:45 ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-19 10:08 ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-19 10:58 ` Alan Cox
2002-09-19 11:14 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2002-09-19 13:28 ` Alan Cox
2002-09-19 13:27 ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-19 17:48 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-09-19 18:02 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020919111422.GD31033@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=aia21@cantab.net \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=andre@linux-ide.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox