Re: [BENCHMARK] Corrected gcc3.2 v gcc2.95.3 contest results

Erik Andersen
2002-09-23T12:42:22Z

On Mon Sep 23, 2002 at 08:30:21PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Yes you make a very valid point and something I've been stewing over privately
> for some time. contest runs benchmarks in a fixed order with a "priming" compile
> to try and get pagecaches etc back to some sort of baseline (I've been trying
> hard to make the results accurate and repeatable).

It would sure be nice for this sortof test if there were
some sort of a "flush-all-caches" syscall...

-Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--