From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 08:36:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 08:36:16 -0400 Received: from 209-166-240-202.cust.walrus.com.240.166.209.in-addr.arpa ([209.166.240.202]:19616 "EHLO ti3.telemetry-investments.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 08:36:15 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 08:41:33 -0400 From: "Bill Rugolsky Jr." To: Alexander Viro Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: union-mount / unionfs API changes? Message-ID: <20021001084133.A1059@ti19> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Al, You mentioned a long time ago that the fs union changes would not go into 2.4 because they required VFS API changes. Will those API changes, if not the implementation, be merged before the next stable release? You are obviously very busy elsewhere in the tree, but I'd hate to see this slip through the cracks ... Regards, Bill Rugolsky